Parasound vs Rotel Amps


I have already searched for this but the threads are pretty old. I have long been a huge fan of the Parasound Halo series. I owned a few A51, A52, and recently had tried their "New Classic" line. However, I feel Parasound has NOT updated their technology for a long time. The Halo is pretty much still what John Curl has originally designed. Also their pre-amps are also lagging behind, unlike Rotel which already has the latest Dolby ATMOS and DTS:X.  

Therefore, Rotel has always been my choice for the Pre. I had the RSP 1570, and now the latest RSP-1576. So what's everyone's view on rotel Amps? Do they sound as good the Halo? My choice is either a new Rotel or continue with my Halo. I've looked at many manufactures and it seems like Rotel has the best warranty (5 years). 

I have ML eletrostats for the front an dynaudio audience 42 for all the surrounds. 

Thanks.
angelgz2
@donjr  

7 years ago the Rotel 15xx series amps are not the same as the current newer 15xx series amps. Which Rotel 15xx series amp did you have? 
@caphill thanks for the detailed feedback. I shall keep going with the Halo A51s then. 

Regarding the latest HT codes though, what other brands has the latest codes? I researched Anthem, Marantz and Denon. It’s true they are early adopters, but those aren’t any better than the Rotel. Also I take customer service seriously as well. Rotel’s warranty service has always been the best for me, plus their 5 year warranty. I’ve looked at Krell and Nad and they are even further behind on the latest codes.
Side tracking question, would a tube amp truly beat the Halo A51 for the Electrostats? I’ve heard great stories but am not ready to drop $3000 for minimum improvement. They sound pretty good as is now. 
@angelgz2

Yes you should keep your Parasound Halo A51 amp. The Marantz, Anthem, Arcam, Audio Control, McIntosh, Yamaha, Onkyo / Integra HT processors are early adaptors and especially the Denon Marantz Onkyo/Integra are usually the first that adapt new AV technologies and new formats & codecs.

The new Marantz AV8805 will perform and sound better than your Rotel RSP-1576 processor. Rotel makes great amplifiers but when it comes to HT processors IMO the Marantz is slightly better. Besides, your Rotel RSP-1576 is not a Rotel’s top of the line HT processor. Currently the RSP-1582 is Rotel’s top of line HT processor but the RSP-1582 does not support latest formats and codecs eg Dolby Atmos DTS-X Auro 3-D, 4K HDR Dolby Vision. The RSP-1582 sounds and performs better than your RSP-1576.
I got a feeling that Rotel is probably going to release a new replacement for its flagship RSP-1582 possibly next year.

In regards to a tube power amp vs your Parasound Halo A51 driving your ML electrostats, I don't think you will be able to find a five-channel tube power amp. Or unless you're thinking to use a stereo or monoblock tube amps to drive your front ML electrostats? What kind of ML electrostats do you have? The big ML electrostats would need big high current solid state amp to drive them properly. Their speaker impedances are very low and can drop to around 2 ohms or below. So a low wattage tube amps just won't cut it, unless if you get a hybrid amp (tube input stage & solid state output stage) such as the PS Audio BHK 300 monoblock amps or the BHK 250 stereo amp.