Dyna, I’m going to go out on a limb here & say you missed there point. You have suggested vinyl as being antiquated & inferior (sound wise / I guess you like the looks) to digital, while using a Garrard Zero 100 as your standard. Probably not a fair comparison, unless you have another vinyl standard.
Boxer:
Hmmmm....misunderstanding all around. I grew up with records. Listened to my parents' and my schoolmates' systems. The Zero-100 I purchased in 1972 or '73 was my first turntable. I owned others up until about '92 when I quit records altogether. I referenced the Zero-100 as an example of how turntables can "look cool." Both immediate respondents erroneously assumed that 50+ year old turntable was my vinyl SQ standard. They did not read (or understand) the context of my post and got it wrong.
Plus, Elizabeth shows me no favor because, in jest, I teased her about using her refrigerator to "burn-in" her uber-expensive AC plugs.
My opinion of vinyl use being mostly about nostalgia and "retro-coolness" stands. I find that outdated "system" terribly inconvenient and mechanically complex; others find it fun and completely listenable. However, IMO, no matter how much money your throw at it or how much you like it, the phonograph record cannot compete with digital as a playback method...assuming equality of other factors. .
Again, in my opinion, analog equipment/media vendors are getting rich pandering to those that crave the latest fashion. Smart - but often dishonest - marketing.