Funny that 2009 study is the first that comes up when I googled it, with a broken link.
However, you were persistent enough to find it!
A big sample of a whole 13 people! With a mean age of 27!!?
Their second conclusion was fine, until the last part:
*****Trained listeners cannot discriminate between CD quality and mp3 compression (256-320kb/s),while expert listeners could***
Because they had so few individuals (13) they can't compare results from experts and non-experts. It might take at least 10 times as many individuals before they could make statistically valid observations about that. And they never defined what makes for a trained listener and what makes for an expert trained listener.
Simple statistics.
Besides, with the admittedly nice equipment you listed, are you saying that you cannot differentiate between mp3 and CD?
However, you were persistent enough to find it!
A big sample of a whole 13 people! With a mean age of 27!!?
Their second conclusion was fine, until the last part:
*****Trained listeners cannot discriminate between CD quality and mp3 compression (256-320kb/s),while expert listeners could***
Because they had so few individuals (13) they can't compare results from experts and non-experts. It might take at least 10 times as many individuals before they could make statistically valid observations about that. And they never defined what makes for a trained listener and what makes for an expert trained listener.
Simple statistics.
Besides, with the admittedly nice equipment you listed, are you saying that you cannot differentiate between mp3 and CD?