Skin effect is frequency dependent and negligible at audio frequencies.
This is not exactly true, although it is common to think of it that way. So common that the fundamental was lost.
One might say that the skin effect consideration is affected by the wire or path of transmission, and that the formula we use is specifically tied to ’wire’, or lengths of pathway that are longer than they are wide..
Then that formula is ’made up’, regarding ’black box’ analysis of AC flow in said geometry of the flow.
Or, that the phenomena of skin effect, has been applied to transmission lines, the formula is created for application to transmission lines in engineering and design.... and then people take this simplistic single point and misapply and call it skin effect, when in fact, it is not. Far from it.
Skin effect is indicative of a greater consideration than the simplistic transmission line formula suggests. That the complexity of Skin effect and it’s origins were and are ’black boxed’ for simplistic engineering work.
That the black box is a far bigger thing than the simple formula or it’s generic and common application.
What is in the black box of skin effect?