2. speakers
  3. 130142-18996

Rythmik L12 or F12

Experience or knowledge of these compact, sealed subs...? Looking to buy a pair. Is there a significant difference between the two? About a $700 up charge for the F12s. To be paired with Salk Silk monitors...
larseand
powerestudio
20 posts
 
Does Rythmik F12 generate hot when running or it is cold?
melm
1,082 posts
 
You can’t go wrong with a Rythmik sub.

FWIW, I’ve been using an L12 for a few years. A single one in a relatively small environment and I’m quite happy with it. It’s a quality sound used here principally for classical music and some pop, not theater.

IIRC the output spec in db was very close to that of the F12. A major difference is that the L12 cannot be connected to the speaker; it MUST be fed from a preamp with RCA connects.

I think the owner of Rythmik, who is a real audiophile, will get on the phone with you and discuss the differences in an honest way.
danoroo
239 posts
 
On the Rythmik website, there's also something called the F12-300.
It seems this sub has a less powerful amp with fewer tuning options, but it says nothing about the driver.  The photo looks like the same driver as the F12.  I wonder if it is?
willieva's avatar
willieva
61 posts
 

I have the f12se and have run them with Acoustat Monitor 3's and with a pair of Magnapan 1.7's that my son owns.. beefy amp.. fast and quick, might depend somewhat on what loudspeaker you are partnering with?

crossover point, etc.. but is a more expensive model so it should be a superior product.  It was right after that I saw a newer model with two 8's which you could crossover at a higher freq. I wonder how that model does?

More to discover