Based on what others (pro and non-pro reviewers) have said, the Gryphon Diablo 300’s sound quality cannot be matched by separates at this price-point. So for me it is sound quality and value. At my budget I struggle to find seperates that have audiophile grade transparency and imaging and yet also have a good bass foundation, presence and with overall musicality driven by drive, timing, attack, decay and dynamics. I’ve been finding lots of options that achieve the transparency and imaging but seem to fall short in some or all of the other areas. Another thing is that I find some audiophile grade components to have not the right amount of bloom to certain tones to suit my tastes. In other words they sound too lean, cold, and dry and not as musically engaging.
I’m completely open to seperates if I can beat the Diablo’s SQ for the same price.
They reason the value is there is you don’t have to factor in the cost of the chassis. I saw some mfr (could have been McIntosh) say that a major portion of cost of a component is attributed to the chassis.
That said, I still have yet to audition the Gryphon Diablo so I am at this point relying on what (many) others have said. It sounds like it will tick off all the boxes I’m looking at. I will be testing it over the next two weeks sometime to decide for myself.
I’m completely open to seperates if I can beat the Diablo’s SQ for the same price.
They reason the value is there is you don’t have to factor in the cost of the chassis. I saw some mfr (could have been McIntosh) say that a major portion of cost of a component is attributed to the chassis.
That said, I still have yet to audition the Gryphon Diablo so I am at this point relying on what (many) others have said. It sounds like it will tick off all the boxes I’m looking at. I will be testing it over the next two weeks sometime to decide for myself.