Why the facination with integrated amps?


I don’t get it. Is it the manufacturers spotting a trend with the tail wagging the dog or does a significant market segment truly prefer the idea of an integrated?
Pros;
Less space
One less set of IC’s
In theory-one less chassis/case to pay for
Shorter signal paths possible
Can combine transformer/cap function
Cons;
Power supply interference/spuriae
Reduced Flexibility-can’t switch amp or preamp as easily or go to monoblocs
Less resonance control
Long history of lesser performance per measurements and long-term subjective listening
Less resale value if it turns out to be a fad
Less liklihood of an extremely high performing active preamp

I freely admit I am a skeptic. The industry-like so many others-looks for new market niches to move product. 
FWIW, the only integrateds I myself would care to audition would be from Esoteric and Luxman who have a long history of designing no-compromise (low-compromise) high-end integrateds. 

128x128fsonicsmith

In my opinion, it really isn't sound quality that is the number one driver for people purchasing an integrated amp.  most people are not audiophiles and don't sit and listen to music for hours on end.  They have "lives" (notice the quotes?) and listen to music while doing other things.  So, music is background music to them.  don't get me wrong, they appreciate good sound, but I believe in most cases (not super high end), aesthetics, space, costs, less complexity are the driving issues in the purchase.

Most places (Europe and other countries) simply don't have large living spaces that can be taken up by lots of equipment and cabling. 

People that are forced to downsize also want less complex equipment and have less space and time to tinker.

Consider, that many people simply have no clue as to the costs of high end equipment and are quite taken aback when they walk into a high end store and see what's offered and the prices.  That's like being prepared to purchase a subaru and mistakenly walking into a Mercedes dealership.  Opp, my bad, time to back out quietly.

I love music, played many instruments and can't stand it when music doesn't sound real or right.  So, I made a conscience choice to make music and listening a priority in my life.  I can't tell you how many people I know think I'm absolutely nuts.

But, they have no problem with distinguishing high end cars, watches, etc.  interesting.

Also, the Wife Acceptance Factor (WAF) is still very much alive and well.  I am starting to see separates looking quite nice, but, this is still a sore spot for many.  Most integrated amps look nice. 

I don't see a new fascination.  Integrated amps or receivers have been around for as long as I can remember.

When I'm ready to downsize, I would be very interested in a very nice integrated.  I'm not sure I want to be worried about tube amps later on.  I already watched on of my Audio Research REF 250 amps go up in flames when a tube failed.  it took out resistors and capacitors and traces.  I was watching when it happened.  $3,000 in repairs later it is perfect.  And those were brand new tubes purchased from a tube supplier that claimed they were matched tubes for that amp.  Never again.  I will only purchase tubes from Audio Research.  they will pay for repairs to their equipment if tubes they supply fail.  lesson learned.  However, a very good solid state amp or integrated amp that can drive my speakers (which may also change when I downsize) is the next step in this adventure.

enjoy 

I think manufacturers have realized integrateds can be the “gateway drug” for getting consumers into their sound/brand as they move up tiers in the cost/quality chain (yeees, not indelibly linked), so they have made them better.
Especially higher end brands that suffer from chronic unattainability. Lower-model separates from such a brand also seem less sexy / attractive in terms of perceived-value than their highest-model integrated... (and this sometimes is true for real SQ because of the first reason above). 
Take any true high end manufacturer, after hearing their better or any separates you wouldn't want to listen to their integrateds for long or at all. However, there might be exceptions, I heard that some people prefer overall the sound of DartZeel integrated to the separates. I personally have not encountered any exception so far.
Here is a dealers take on the matter, our company Audio Doctor sells a lot of integrated amplifiers we carry three classes of integrated amplifiers:

1: Class One, is a lifestyle oriented integrated amplifier these tend to have built in dacs and streamers: Naim’s Uniti products, Nad’s M10 and C368 are good examples of this class amplfiers tend to run in price from $899-$3,300.00

2: Class Two: More expensive more ambitious versions of the above, these are more expensive higher performing units, the more expensive Naim Uniti Star and Nova, the Micromega M100, the Anthem Str, the new Krell K300i these units go up to $8,000.00

3: Class Three: Uber intergrated amplifiers in our store the T+A 3100HV a $23k integrated amplifier and their less expensive 2500R a $12,500.00 integrated amplfiers would be in this class.

The arguement that an integrated amplifier is a compromise is a falicy, the simple fact that you don’t need interconnects and have everything built into a single box means that signal paths are shorter and you lose nothing going from one part of the circuit board to another many of the above integrated amplifiers sound fantastic.

The real arguement is cost does integrated amplfier for X dollars beat a pile of separate components for the same money?

Also another wrinkle in the integrated amplfiers vs separates is the concept of the Dac/preamp and a separate amplifier here at least you only need perhaps one interconnect if the box is a also a streamer or you may need a digital cable if you add a streamer. The new Anthem STR amp and preamp are a great represenation of this concept the STR preamp includes a built in dac and therefore you only need one high end interconnect to the amp.

The Naim Uniti Nova sounds fantastic, at $7,500.00 however, the more expensive separate Naim NAC 272 preamp/dac and a Nap 250dr does sound dramatically better however that package costs $15,000.00 with an interconnect. This is a really amazing sounding two box solution so nearly an intergrated.

So we would comment that a good integrated amplifer may easily do battle with a pile of separates and may beat them, the Micromega M100 includes a great dac, a streamer, a built in phono stage, and a powerful Class A/B power amplifier for $4,500.00

If you compare that product to a pile of many less expensive products that now you have an amplifier like a Parasound which we also sell you are going to be spending $1,500 for an amplifier $1,500.00 for a preamp/dac $400 on an interconnect add in a Blue sound Node for a streamer $500 and a $200 digital cable and you have a combined price tag of $4,100.00 in three separate boxes vs $4,500.00 for the Micromega.

You do now have more flexibilty but does that combo sound better and now you have three boxes power cords interconnects vs one single box which just requires a set of speaker cables.

The high end intergrated amplifier makes using and assembling a good system much easier and sometimes at lower costs.

The new Krell K300i sounds absolutely fantastic for an $8k price point including a good dac and streamer.

The concept of the uber integrated amplifier from T+A shows just how advanced these products have come this $23k reference intergrated amplifier is basically the company’s separate $19k power amplifier and $16k preamplifier put into one chassis the only difference is a simplified preamplifier stage, vs the separates.

So $23k and no interconnect vs $19k + $16k + $3k inteconnect = $38k for an improved sound but you are not giving up mutch as the amplfier stage is exactly the same.

The T+A PA 3100HV integrated will beat most separates, its earlier incarnation which cost $18k was compared to a $120K worth of CH Precison’s separates and the reviewer Allan Taffel, was having a hard time figuring out which one we was listening to

http://www.theabsolutesound.com/articles/ta-pa-3000-hv-and-mp-3000-hv/

"PA3000 not only competes directly with integrated amps that run all the way up to $50k, it holds its own against $120k worth of Switzerland’s best separates. This is a component that’s not to be missed. "

"How close is the sound? Let me start with the PA3000 HV. At $17,000, this 300-watt integrated amp costs about 15 percent of my reference CH Precision C1/2xA1 combo. Yet when I switch between them the most striking thing I hear is their utter similarity.

Of course, I tried to find differences. On the Original Master Recording LP of Donald Fagen’s The Nightfly, I queued up “The Goodbye Look” and carefully compared bass (identical), vocals (identical), the twang of the solo guitar (identical), and the snap of the xylophone (identical). Most importantly, both presentations preserved the percolating rhythm that make this—and many of the album’s other songs—such an enduring pleasure. To be sure, the reference CH equipment creates a wider soundstage, and its tonality is a little more fleshed-out. But I seriously doubt I’d be aware of either of these without a back-to-back comparison.

The biggest difference between the T+A and the CH Precision is at the very top end, where the reference is more refined, though not any more extended. Bear in mind that even this difference, though audible as a touch of roughness, still falls into the subtle category. As evidence, consider that while trying my darndest to ferret out differences like this one, I frequently put down my pen and succumbed to the music. I listened to entire sides of even the most familiar albums.

That’s an indication of how little these scant distinctions matter, and how miraculously close the PA3000’s sound and capacity to captivate come to the higher-buck Swiss Sound stalwarts.

"So if an expensive, $18k or a $23k high end integrated but comparatively cheap compared to the $120k just for the price of the CH Precision gear how much was Mr. Taffels multiple sets of power cords and interconnects can sound nearly as good that should put this concept that a high end integrated can and will be compared to the very best separates and come out sounding as good as or better than many."


Bear in mind that this is vs the older PA 3000, the newer PA 3100 uses an improved preamp stage and a few other improvments that elevate that integrated amplfier into even better performance.

So yes it is clear that a high end intergrated amplifier can either duplicate or exceed the performance of many uber expensive separates.


Dave and Troy
Audio Doctor NJ, Dealers for T+A, Naim, Krell, Micromega, Nad, Parasound


Post removed