@taras22
I'm sure you and Ken are justifiably proud of your cables.
The problem I have is the hyperbole.
Most metals' conductivity decreases when liquid. If there are any voids in the 'fill', conductivity drops like a stone.
The only natural metal liquid at room temperature is mercury which has 1/60 Cu conductivity. The DCR could be overcome by making the wire 60 times as large, but then L would decrease by a factor of about 6. C could be kept the same by changing dielectric.
So if one keeps R and C constant, changing L by a factor of 6, one has created a new filter and one that is probably quite audible. Depending on source and destination response, the new filter may be a plus and maybe not.
To claim "TEO’s Liquid Cable interconnect cables are best characterized by their absence of character. … etc." strains credibility.
If the cables are not in fact a flowing material, then the "Liquid" moniker is just more marketing malarkey.
I'm sure you and Ken are justifiably proud of your cables.
The problem I have is the hyperbole.
Most metals' conductivity decreases when liquid. If there are any voids in the 'fill', conductivity drops like a stone.
The only natural metal liquid at room temperature is mercury which has 1/60 Cu conductivity. The DCR could be overcome by making the wire 60 times as large, but then L would decrease by a factor of about 6. C could be kept the same by changing dielectric.
So if one keeps R and C constant, changing L by a factor of 6, one has created a new filter and one that is probably quite audible. Depending on source and destination response, the new filter may be a plus and maybe not.
To claim "TEO’s Liquid Cable interconnect cables are best characterized by their absence of character. … etc." strains credibility.
If the cables are not in fact a flowing material, then the "Liquid" moniker is just more marketing malarkey.