Question About DACs


My CDP runs an internal Burr-Brown 24-bit DAC, and a Crystal Semiconductor CS8420 sample-rate converter chip that upsamples the CD data to 96kHz. It’s an older CDP obviously, but are the newer external multibit DACs, such as the Schiit Gumby and Bitfrost, far superior to what I have now? Or, would any improvement be a slight one? Thanks.

rlb61
joshfilm
Feel free to stick to your guns on this, but the alternative is to go and listen to a few of the products that are being highlighted...
This makes such common sense that it’s difficult to understand why anyone wouldn’t follow it. But we have users such as mzkmxcv who believe:
Measurements are 100% accurate in predicting sound quality in DACs
Listening is superfluous to such contributors - it apparently just doesn’t interest them. And - as I’ve noted before - their insistence that others conduct blind tests is odd given their refusal to conduct their own, or participate in that of others.
Post removed 
mzkmxcv
A DAC sounding “boring” is a non-descript term, as useless as “lacking rhythm”.  
 
Some descriptions that can be used ...
Pardon me, but everyone here is free to use whatever language they like to describe what they hear, within the forum's terms of use, of course.  No one is bound to use the terms you prefer.
There is $10,000 reward if you can tell two amps apart ...
That kind of canard has been exposed here many times. There is no such reward.

Post removed 
@mzk...(what follows is a sincere question without an ounce of rhetorical in it) im curious if you have been to an audio show or have tried a ton of equipment out a a dealer or auditioned a ton of gear in your own system? 

If so, do you like most of it? What percentage of it would you say does satisfy your taste for musical reproduction? I.e. allows you to enjoy the music?

one of my pet theories is that we all have very different thresholds for when music becomes enjoyable, I.e. how much we are affected by the technical quality of the sound. It doesn’t make someone a “better” listener, but it is an indicator how refined the gear will be before it is satisfying enough to lead to long listening sessions.

(people may also be sensitive to different parts of the spectrum and different audio parameters.)

it seems from your stance that you might be lucky enough to find a lot of audio gear very satisfying. You are lucky indeed.

A high threshold can be a curse until you find something that works. 

and p.s. I find “boring” a word that should be used more. I find it could be a wake up call to the industry if it was used more and more honestly. Do you not know what I mean when I say that when DACs don’t impress, it’s often because they are “boring”? It’s direct and fairly universally understood, no? Though I guess there are people incapable of excitement and thrill and awe that might think “boring” is kinda a common shade of everything. I didn’t use the word in regard to the DAC you are highlighting, btw.

what makes “transparent “ a better word to describe what you are talking about?

another point I might be making is that maybe we are measuring the wrong thing... I’d be interested to see (even your) brain scans listening to a well-measuring DAC that I consider “boring” vs the brain scans listening to a well-measuring DAC that I consider exciting, musical, etc... (in a sufficiently revealing system in both cases)... and then compare both to your DAC of choice. Then we’d have some measurements that would be interesting to consider. (Way off topic now...) 

Anyways, curious us about the questions above.

Doubly curious about that post that got deleted. We’re you insulting?

ymmv