Andy2, I understand that. My point is how close is close enough? Do we know there is absolutely nothing out there that will be close to the original mid, so much so that using the closest aftermarket driver will be obnoxious? I know it won't be exact. But I don't know if a replacement driver will be 1) totally wrong for the speaker, impacting the sound in a harsh or muted way, or 2) close enough that certain nuances are noticeable, but acceptable. That's all I'm saying here. Short of finding an original mid and having it rebuilt, what is the next best option? I currently enjoy my 3.5s with a Scanspeak aftermarket mid, I just want to know how close I can come to the factory mid, that's all (because I am likely missing out on the full capability of the speaker). Chances are good that any direction I go towards the original specs will be an improvement that I'm willing to live with, or without.
- ...
- 13544 posts total
Bluetone, Unless you really really really really love the 3.5s, like a lot, the smartest thing to do is to get something else, keep an eye out for some drivers that will work in the 3.5s, put them in, and sell them. They're a finicky speaker that's what, 30 years old? The EQs need constant attention (at least mine did) and the mids are asked to reproduce too much bandwidth and blow frequently. They are simply overworked. On top of that, they're shouty and harsh. I've been there! There's a pair of 2.3s on usaudiomart for $625 right now. |
after 35 years of having Thiel, I agree with Tom that the best sound is pretty much straight ahead, or maybe a tiny bit of toe in. i have my 3.7's set up with a distance of 9' between the coaxes and 8' from my ears to the coaxes. i got a lot of good info from MapleShade plus i really like their Sampson rack and brass feet. http://www.mapleshadestore.com/freeupgrades.php |
- 13544 posts total