Component isolation


Let’s say you’re going to add isolation feet to a component with no moving parts, such as a preamp, phono stage, DAC, amp, tuner, etc. 

Which one is most critical to the extent would get your attention first? 
128x128zavato
Isolation need not involve damping or lack thereof. The Townshend Audio Seismic products and the IsoAcoustic GAIA's provide isolation only.
Without going into the stratosphere, I always do power amps or integrated amp first, either tube or transistor - no difference. 
That's, after turntable and speakers. Phono stage first will get you nowhere, so will the dac. Preamp maybe but I don't see why start there. Power cords on the amps are also my first move regarding this part of system assembling. Power amps by definition are bad, better start there.
I'm not sure whether anything without moving parts requires isolation. Why would it? Can resonances actually convert into electrical signal? If so, can we hear them?

I know Naim Audio have long employed various isolation strategies to reduce the effects of vibration in their pre-amps but they were almost unique in this regard. I recall that the circuit board on their 32.5 pre was mounted on top a piece of sponge.

@erik_squires, Townshend Audio have purported to provide some scientific evidence to back up their speaker isolation stands. My guess is that the benefits of isolation diminish rapidly with solid state devices where there is a lot less rattling about, and even then any benefits are perhaps only apparent with extremely low level unamplified audio signals (pre-amps or earlier).

Michael Green's post was interesting and I'm tempted to agree with his findings, especially those regarding high and low mass. However, as I'm also tempted to believe in life after death, a little scientific rationale would be most welcome.      

Until then it just remains a matter of faith, nothing to get too hung about. Besides, as @elizabeth  pointed out it's no big deal to experiment with Sorbothane or similar even for those less critical areas.




The signal itself is subject to mechanical vibration. That’s why isolating apparently inert objects results in better sound and why isolating, i.e., suspending cables and power cords results in better sound. Furthermore, objects that appear to be inert actually are not (rpt not) inert. For example capacitors vibrate and transformers vibrate. There is no getting around it. That’s why a wise man loosens or removes the bolts holding the transformer to the chassis and isolates the circuit boards from the transformer and isolates the transformer from the chassis or removes and relocates the transformer.

Furthermore seismic vibration moves the entire building structure so, even if there was such a thing as a completely inert component, which there isn’t, it would still be moving right along with the building’s motion. There’s no getting around it.