The DAC3 volume did not have enough granularity for me to be happy with it. It was rather coarse in the steps available.This was with the digital inputs? I guess this is the penalty of using a pot. The RME doesn't have this problem as it uses a precise rotary encoder for VC which works in 0.5dB steps and the display also shows you the volume level.
Benchmark DAC 3 HGC or RME ADI-2 DAC
I will be buying a new dac, in order to replace my Lavry DA10. I am satisfied with the sound of the Lavry, but it lacks a remote control.
If I do, it will be one of the two mentioned as I am familiar with brands from studio applications. The RME seems like the obvious choice. It has some EQ ability which would be useful to me, reviews about the sound quality compared to everything else are pretty positive, and it's about half the price.
So which would you choose and why? I'm wondering what I may be missing that might justify the price of the benchmark?
If I do, it will be one of the two mentioned as I am familiar with brands from studio applications. The RME seems like the obvious choice. It has some EQ ability which would be useful to me, reviews about the sound quality compared to everything else are pretty positive, and it's about half the price.
So which would you choose and why? I'm wondering what I may be missing that might justify the price of the benchmark?
- ...
- 13 posts total
- 13 posts total