Vibratory or Not?


This is a discussion that for me began on the Stereophile forum which went horribly wrong in my opinion. I was wondering though if this same topic could be discussed here as it comes up a lot in one form or another. My background has been about vibratory tuning as far back as the 70's work in the recording industry and continued into home audio and beyond. The audio signal is one that can be easily tuned, I doubt there is much room there for debate, but we will see, it's Audiogon after all. This being the case I have always concluded that the audio signal is vibratory so has anyone I have ever worked with. It's a common and sometimes even daily practice for someone here to make a vibratory adjustment changing the sound which is obvious to all.

On some of these forum threads however you will see posts saying to get rid of the vibration, without any explanation as to how to remove vibration without altering the audio signal. Every vibratory move I have ever seen done changes the performance of the sound. I've also been a part of the variables of the audio signal during play in real time. If the audio signal is not vibratory how does it change?

I invite you to discuss the vibratory structure and nature of the audio signal.

thanks, lets keep trolling to a minimum please

128x128michaelgreenaudio

geoffkait,

>>>>When you don’t know, guess. That’s your strategy?
Not quite. My strategy is "when not completely and verifiably sure, do not make absolute statements". Learn, geoffkait, learn.

Audio signal in wires is electrical. Audio signal in your head is, for the large part, electrical, too. Stating the obvious, at least obvious to some of us.


Extremely lame. No offense. Breakdown of the education system, obviously
The last person who used "lame" around here is verifiably clueless. You are in the bad company.
It is not fair. I used to tell you that you should get your money back from your school. Come on, no matter how good I am, think of something yourself.
More to discover