The Science of Cables


It seems to me that there is too little scientific, objective evidence for why cables sound the way they do. When I see discussions on cables, physical attributes are discussed; things like shielding, gauge, material, geometry, etc. and rarely are things like resistance, impedance, inductance, capacitance, etc. Why is this? Why aren’t cables discussed in terms of physical measurements very often?

Seems to me like that would increase the customer base. I know several “objectivist” that won’t accept any of your claims unless you have measurements and blind tests. If there were measurements that correlated to what you hear, I think more people would be interested in cables. 

I know cables are often system dependent but there are still many generalizations that can be made.
128x128mkgus
bo1972
... they are just facts ... Most people have no idea how much these different aspects influence the end result of your system ... they just have no F.idea ... you will never understand ...  you are a dreamer ... Most cannot even answer these questions ... it gives you no F. insight into the aspects of sound and the influences on sound and stage ...  it becomes just one big F. gamble ... you just don’t F. understand.
 What's your point here, Bo? Does it have anything at all to do with this thread??
Post removed 
@dave_b : You are right! Audiophiles can believe the stupidest things (copper vs. silver, rhodium-plated outlets, power cables, magic fuses, directionality, wire burn-in ...). Quackery is profitable, unfortunately!
roberjerman2,190 posts04-18-2019 10:26am@dave_b : You are right! Audiophiles can believe the stupidest things (copper vs. silver, rhodium-plated outlets, power cables, magic fuses, directionality, wire burn-in ...). Quackery is profitable, unfortunately!

>>>>Whoa! Hold your horses! I believe all of those points are valid and true. Yet I do not profit from any of them. Skepticism taken to its extreme is what, stupidity? 

A sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from quackery. 
Post removed