Thanks for the great comments, dover. Â You are of course correct when you say that not having been at the recording session one cannot know with certainty which tonal balance is correct. Â I donât disagree that there is âmore gruntâ in Simoneâs voice with the FR. Â As you correctly suggest âmoreâ doesnât necessarily mean better (more accurate). Â Not meaning to argue the point, but for further clarification:
Extrapolating from the overall sonic character and not just the sound of the voice one of the clues that, in this case, âmoreâ vocal grunt may not be correct can be found in, for instance, the sound of the piano and bass. Â To me the sound of the piano sounds more linear (correct) with the Palladian. Â With the FR it sounds slightly thicker as does the bass (although not as extended). Â You correctly pointed out that the bass is better articulated with the Palladian. Â This impression is I think a result of the better linearity. Â Less articulation is I think the result of that pervasive, but slight thickness that the FR adds. Â This is what is heard ad âmore gruntâ in the voice. Â A specific example can be heard at 0:47. Â A simple two note descending line from the bass. Â To me those two notes sound closer to the sound of a real fingers plucking a real bass with the Palladian; better articulated and better texture and pitch definition. Â With the FR I donât hear as much realism in the sound. Â
A clue to the answer of whether the nasality in Simoneâs voice is natural or not can be found, as on the first track, in the sound of the drummerâs brushes. Â Once again, with the FR the sound is too tight and hard, almost metallic. Â With the Palladian one can more clearly hear the softer textured sound of individual bristles. Â
I hate to use of the term âcoloredâ as often (ab)used by we audiophiles since the sound of real instruments has a great deal of natural color. Â However, the description that keeps coming up for me re the sound of the FR is âcoloredâ in the way that some vintage gear is: a little bit of added thickness and darkness to romanticize the midrange, slightly rounded and generous bass range that is not as fully extended and slightly hard highs. Â A general quality that I hear on both tracks. Â Reminds me a bit of the sound of the two versions of the Denon 103 that I owned many moons ago, but on a much higher overall quality level. Â
As you correctly pointed out both cartridges are clearly very good. Â Thanks again for your insights.
Extrapolating from the overall sonic character and not just the sound of the voice one of the clues that, in this case, âmoreâ vocal grunt may not be correct can be found in, for instance, the sound of the piano and bass. Â To me the sound of the piano sounds more linear (correct) with the Palladian. Â With the FR it sounds slightly thicker as does the bass (although not as extended). Â You correctly pointed out that the bass is better articulated with the Palladian. Â This impression is I think a result of the better linearity. Â Less articulation is I think the result of that pervasive, but slight thickness that the FR adds. Â This is what is heard ad âmore gruntâ in the voice. Â A specific example can be heard at 0:47. Â A simple two note descending line from the bass. Â To me those two notes sound closer to the sound of a real fingers plucking a real bass with the Palladian; better articulated and better texture and pitch definition. Â With the FR I donât hear as much realism in the sound. Â
A clue to the answer of whether the nasality in Simoneâs voice is natural or not can be found, as on the first track, in the sound of the drummerâs brushes. Â Once again, with the FR the sound is too tight and hard, almost metallic. Â With the Palladian one can more clearly hear the softer textured sound of individual bristles. Â
I hate to use of the term âcoloredâ as often (ab)used by we audiophiles since the sound of real instruments has a great deal of natural color. Â However, the description that keeps coming up for me re the sound of the FR is âcoloredâ in the way that some vintage gear is: a little bit of added thickness and darkness to romanticize the midrange, slightly rounded and generous bass range that is not as fully extended and slightly hard highs. Â A general quality that I hear on both tracks. Â Reminds me a bit of the sound of the two versions of the Denon 103 that I owned many moons ago, but on a much higher overall quality level. Â
As you correctly pointed out both cartridges are clearly very good. Â Thanks again for your insights.