2. speakers
  3. 148431-92835

Quad 2912 vs Martin Logan ESL 11a

I am seriously considering electrostatic speakers although living in a part of the world where dealership for both brands do not have all models on hand for audition. While the 2912's were unavailable, a Quad 2812 was available a month ago for audition. It was in an all Quad setup, with a solid state and a 40  watts tube amp for comparison. In a 4 x 4m room, the music was very engaging playing Miles, Coltrane, and Heifetz. Transparency and speed were plenty evident, and  there was a warmth and solidity ( coherence ?) that was a pleasant surprise.  

Last weekend,  audition of  the Martin Logan's esl X was arranged . This is a few step down from the 11a's. Although it was in a totally different system, the ML seemed to be of a different sound signature. Brighter, more air? Ultimately I was not  impressed with the X's, the woofer seemed not to integrate well with the panels. And the salesperson admitted as mush. He said an audition could be arranged in a week or two for the 11a. 

While I wait for a proper audition of the ML 11a,  I would appreciate any comment specific to these two speaker models. Not all electrostatic speakers are created equal, as I have found out.   If the choice came down to the two, what are the issues that needs to be considered?
ledoux1238
pvmike
40 posts
 
this is just my opinion. the one thing to remember is with the 9a the base speakers are passive meaning they will not be driven by their own amps. this translates to what amp are you using and will it have enough bottom end. I also have a small listening space and the 11a's fit well as can be expected. the speakers sit 4' from the side walls and the rear of the speakers are about 1.5' from the rear wall. The speakers were set up by the personnel that have been setting up sound systems from the store I bought them from. they took about 3 hours to get them placed. 
pvmike
Post removed 
pvmike
40 posts
 
just remembered the 9A does not have room correction either

audiotroy's avatar
audiotroy
3,940 posts
 
Ledoux we sell neither of these loudspeakers 

Used to own Quad ESL 63 so the newer versions are still very similar.

The Quads all suffer from rolled off extreme top end and the bass response isn't that clean, a bit wooly.

The ML are the better overall design, the curved panel helps create a more focused soundstage and the bass response is far better.

You may also want to check out the Mura SP1 at $15k these are the best panel hybrid speakes we have ever heard.

Dave and Troy
Audio Doctor NJ 
ledoux1238 OP
353 posts
 
@pvmike, Thanks for sharing you speaker placement info.  I would have thought that 4' and 1.5' from side and rear walls respectively were too close, not enough space to breathe.  But if professionals set up the speakers in your room with those final placement dimensions, then maybe my room size is possible to accommodate the 11a's. I do expect a fair amount of work getting the speakers to sound good as @hthaller mentioned, even with the final ARC adjustments. 

@audiotroy, thanks for your comments, I kind of understand your thoughts on the Quads. The rolled off highs and bass response were noticeable, although I wouln't  call the bass 'wooly'. 

It would seem that there are more nods to ML than Quads. I am definitely doing a second Quad audition just to make sure I agree.

Thanks so far to all your comments!
More to discover