@glupson As I wrote in the second post, of course some of these R2R manufacturers are making digital products today. I don't see hundreds of successful buggy whip manufacturers around any more, so keeping up with technology is clearly key to staying in business.
The point I was trying to make is, just like any technology, there is digital and then there is DIGITAL, where the most accurate and highest quality digital equipment can be manufactured at high cost. Someone has to be the best at this technology; I really don't think your ipod or whatever quite meets that standard, and many here pay huge prices for what are marketed as super-high-quality digital components.
They get to hear their digital recordings played back on the best possible equipment available, and if the recording was done with an equal level of quality digital equipment and recording engineers who are knowledgeable about that process, you are going to hear digital at its best.
Doesn't mean it is "better" than analog; it is simply different. A favorite analogy of mine concerns "electronic" drums and "Hammond B-3 Chips."
They are both used in the recording studio and in live concerts. Do they sound anything like "real" drums or a "real" B-3? Of course not. BUT, they imitate those instruments and provide their own unique sound. If the composer wants that sound, they use those digital instruments. If they want the original sound, they use the original instruments. No right or wrong here, just preferences. Now, if you are thinking that your digital instruments DO sound like the originals, that is where we have an issue. You need a better education or a better ear, I guess.
Cheers!
The point I was trying to make is, just like any technology, there is digital and then there is DIGITAL, where the most accurate and highest quality digital equipment can be manufactured at high cost. Someone has to be the best at this technology; I really don't think your ipod or whatever quite meets that standard, and many here pay huge prices for what are marketed as super-high-quality digital components.
They get to hear their digital recordings played back on the best possible equipment available, and if the recording was done with an equal level of quality digital equipment and recording engineers who are knowledgeable about that process, you are going to hear digital at its best.
Doesn't mean it is "better" than analog; it is simply different. A favorite analogy of mine concerns "electronic" drums and "Hammond B-3 Chips."
They are both used in the recording studio and in live concerts. Do they sound anything like "real" drums or a "real" B-3? Of course not. BUT, they imitate those instruments and provide their own unique sound. If the composer wants that sound, they use those digital instruments. If they want the original sound, they use the original instruments. No right or wrong here, just preferences. Now, if you are thinking that your digital instruments DO sound like the originals, that is where we have an issue. You need a better education or a better ear, I guess.
Cheers!