New Santana, Lowest Dynamic Range Ever

My main issue with U2 is the Achtung Baby album. It does not come across as a DR issue and for the most part it isn't with average DR of around 11 which is normally very listenable.

The problem I have with AB is that it is oppressively bass heavy and the bass is sloppy and muddy and obscures other parts of the music. It was my understanding that the band was influenced by techno dance music with its throbbing bass. I think they just took it too far and engineered the album poorly from a purely SQ perspective.

Joshua Tree has similar if slightly better DR and I never noticed any problems with it.

 @jaybe "Once it goes under 6 or 7 I’m done. Regardless. Maybe only a couple exceptions."

I agree with you but there is a lot of good stuff being put out these days that rarely exceeds 6 - 7. I hate missing out on it.

So I listen to a lot of it in the car where it does not matter. 

When I want to listen on my hi-fi system I often tweak EQ of ripped CDs in iTunes run through BitPerfect  (I know, I know, I know.....not an ideal solution) but it does improve things.

I think, but don't know enough about it all to say for sure, that this plays on the principle of the Fletcher-Munson curve where the sensitivity of the human ear to loudness changes as a function of frequency. I might be way off base here but based on that it seems like adjusting the various frequencies via an EQ can make overly compressed music at least a little more pleasant. I make the adjustment based on a few songs on any given album. Far too tedious to adjust for every song.

Again, it helps. But it is not the solution because there is no solution to overly compressed DR. You can tune up what isn't there.

I just listened to AFRICA SPEAKS and it is going into my library. I do like it but can sense that the recording is too hot.