Which is better for sound quality?

http://www.ti.com/product/OPA2134 OR http://www.ti.com/product/OPA1642, the OPA1642 can be used fully diferential(balanced) to a studio monitor or amp, just like the OPA2134, but which has a better sound quality? the OPA1642 is in a Roland Mobile UA USB interface(https://www.roland.com/global/products/mobile_ua/) with the DAC AKM AK4414EQ, and the OPA2134 in the Emotiva DAC pre-amp XDA1(https://darko.audio/2011/08/emotiva-xda-1-dac/) with the DAC Analog devices AD1955.

joser961606-18-2019 2:45am

joser9616 OP Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 29 posts 06-18-2019 at 03:05am Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete Ok, but which one do you prefer of those two? the OPA1642 or OPA2134 and why? thanks :-)
joser9616 OP Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 29 posts 06-18-2019 at 03:09am Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete Excuse me, it's not the OPA1642, it's the TPA6120A2 vs OPA2134, which one is better for audio, which has better quality, thanks.
georgehifi Details Discussions Posts This discussion 10,312 posts 06-18-2019 at 06:01am Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete TPA6120A2 Do you know what package this comes in, how will you use/install that? Cheers George
joser9616 OP Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 29 posts 06-18-2019 at 10:09am Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete In this page is the Roland Mobile UA open: http://prosound.ixbt.com/interfaces/roland-ma10.shtml and here the Emotiva: https://darko.audio/2011/08/emotiva-xda-1-dac/
liamowen Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 196 posts 06-19-2019 at 01:36am Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete I am glad George is part of our group.