2. digital
  3. 149453-120364

Unfiltered NOS DACs sound

I Have been experimenting with some NOS DAC chips and redbook material.
I very much like the NOS sound, and frankly think in terms of transparency it trumps any of the modern DS DACs Ive heard. The biggest drawback is THD and noise levels, on paper the modern chips out perform the older NOS chips and I think thats easy to hear but its superior ability to preserve of timing and spatial information in the music makes that problem relatively insignificant.

I have experimented with high quality software based upsampling, the conclusion is that any form of oversampling loses the ’’special’’ NOS sound.

Steep analogue filters did not affect transparency as much as software digital filtering, but the sound became dull and lacking vibrancy. I would choose the ’’processed’’ digitally filtered sound over this dull analogue filtered sound any day, but still NOS remains sounding the best.
I tried gentler (simpler circuit) analogue filters and more extended (filtering higher into the ultrasonic range), and the gains from the filters were never worth the filters influence on audible frequencies.

So as it stands the best sound I can achieve with these NOS chips is with a raw unfiltered PCM output.
The artifacts within unfiltered 44.1kHz PCM are very significant but ultrasonic, so it seems that the audible influence of this ultrasonic noise has on the system is not as siginificant as the means of removing it.... but this is probably not true in all systems.

What amazes me the most is that this is with redbook material... DS DACs and upsampling are supposed to be the more advanced methods of dealing with the limitations of 16 bit 44.1kHz data.
Unfiltered NOS naturally seems the most transparent and accurate way of experiencing Hi Res DXD and 192kHz material.

I know that unfiltered NOS has a sort of cult following, are there any other fans of it here?

suix6
suix6 OP
10 posts
 
Thanks for the response.
I use a TDA1387 based DIY DAC. The chips costs pennies and is as simple as it gets as far as building DACS go. Performance for the price is quite astonishing.

This was one of the last NOS chips made, and features newer type of techonology compared to older ’’R2R’’ types which I dont have a hope of understanding, but some have said on DIY forums that this newer multibit technology is superior to older R2R in some ways due to not using internal resistors which inherently suffer from accuracy issues.
The drawback is only 16 bit support, luckily high sample rates are still supported which I think is the most important aspect of Hi Res.
roxy54's avatar
roxy54
8,013 posts
 
suix6,
Completely agree with you. I think those who haven't tried R2R DACs are really missing out on more natural sound. I would never go back.
lowrider57's avatar
lowrider57
5,417 posts
 
My search ended when I purchased an Audio Note DAC2.1x Signature. It's NOS with absolutely no filters.

An 18Bit Analogue Devices chip is used (it's preferred over the 20 bit). In addition, there is a tube gain stage and tube rectification, and transformers are custom built in-house.
This dac accepts 44.1, 48, and  96KHz sample rates. 

It's been a transformational part of my audio rig.


toneranger58
134 posts
 
Absolutely love my Schiit Yggdrasil A2. Has put digital listening on par with vinyl, still different but as enjoyable. Have also experienced great benefit from upgraded power cord for the Yggy.
audioman58's avatar
audioman58
4,185 posts
 
There are a lot of factors , for example my Belcanto dac has
2 Femto clocks -that is Trillions, older dacs are in picoseconds. ,  much much better accuracy 
reading the digital signal , power supplies also Very critical 
seperate very low noise for analog as well as digital signals very 
important , and many other things . My New 2.7 dac sounds very much like the older types, smooth very musical and still very accurate. It is all about the implementation. Many companies 
do digital but not all are musically involving.
More to discover