Uh,
Not by percentage. Not alphabetically.
While all those might be interesting, the deal here is by price.
Throw in a few relevant details, key word being "relevant", so much the better.
almarg writes:
Indeed. Quite so. Thanks!
List your System Ingredients: Listed most to least expensive, by list price or price paid
Not by percentage. Not alphabetically.
While all those might be interesting, the deal here is by price.
Throw in a few relevant details, key word being "relevant", so much the better.
almarg writes:
Seems to me like a very reasonable idea for a thread, that would be of interest to some even if (as might be expected) clear trends don’t emerge. For one thing, lack of a trend could in itself be reasonably considered to be a trend. For another thing, it seems expectable that many audiophiles would find it interesting to gain some idea of how other audiophiles have apportioned their audio-related investments, especially other audiophiles they may have become familiar with here, over the years.
In any event, at least so far it seems like a considerably more pleasant thread than some others I can think of.
Regards,
-- Al
Indeed. Quite so. Thanks!