WHAT SHOULD BE MY NEXT SYSTEM UPGRADE?


Forgive the length of this entry, but I am anticipating questions I am likely to receive and wanted to provide as much useful information as possible.

I focus on listening to the music and am not prone to frequent system upgrades.  When I do upgrade it is because the improvement in sound quality is obvious to both my wife and I and seems to be a good value. We both play musical instruments, listen almost exclusively to classical and jazz, regularly attend concerts, especially orchestral works, chamber music and small jazz groups.  The classical performances are all in venues with good to excellent acoustics, so over many years of listening we know how live performances should sound.

Several months ago I purchased a Lumin U1 mini digital music player after auditioning a Lumin T2 and comparing the DAC in the T2 to my current Ayre QSB-9 DSD DAC.  What became apparent was that the existing DAC was not the most significant limiting factor in our system.  By connecting the Lumin to my iMac via an Ethernet switch and cables, and using it as a player only, the clarity of the music improved markedly.  I attribute this to the reported higher levels of “noise” transmitted through the iMac’s USB connection.  The Lumin was “quieter” - less noise and distortion, and has the added benefit of providing us with an excellent streamer for our Qobuz Hi-Res subscription.  So I purchased the Lumin U1 mini, which is a digital player only.  (We use both the Lumin app and Roon to listen to our own digitized music and Qobuz.)

Having spent a bit of time reading threads on Audiogon, articles in various publications and talking to a few dealers, it seems that I might achieve further marked improvements in sound quality - clarity, detail and accuracy of reproduction, less noise and distortion, better soundstage - by using a music server as a file source and/or by upgrading to a newer DAC.  While the other components in our system may be improved upon, our experience in auditioning various speakers and amps over the years, including in the past 12 months, lead me to believe the digital source/processing is where the biggest gains can be achieved.  

Our current system for the main listening room consists of the following components.

Mac Mini i7 with music on an external Thunderbolt hard drive (RAID 1 configuration) 

Lumin U1 mini digital music player

Ayre QSB-9 DSD DAC

Ayre CX-7emp CD player

Ayre K5-emp pre-amplifier

Proceed HPA-2 dual mono amplifier 

Aerial Acoustics Model 8b speakers

Transparent Plus (generation 5) interconnects

Transparent 10 ga. in-wall speaker cables (bi-wire terminations)

Audioquest Niagara 1000 power conditioner

Transparent USB (Lumin to Ayre DAC) and power cables

The purchases of the CD player, pre-amp, power conditioner and Lumin unit all made very noticeable improvements to sound quality.  Our digitized music collection now sounds virtually the same as, if not a bit better than the original CDs played on the Ayre CD player.  It was noticeably inferior before the Lumin was added to the system.

I’m seeking input from Audiogon members as to components they believe would provide the most improvement for the dollar to our current system, with an emphasis on digital music servers and DACs.  Let’s save recommendations regarding pre-amps, amps and speakers for another time.

With respect to music servers, a simple solution would be to replace the MacMini with the $1,200 Lumin L1, basically a hard drive and associated hardware designed for digital music use.  It can connect to my Lumin U1 mini via Ethernet, which I understand to be preferable to USB, with some recent suggestions to the contrary.  One downside is the need to reconnect to a computer every time you want to transfer a CD you’ve ripped or a file you’ve downloaded to the L1.  Local dealers also carry music servers by Aurender, Auralic, and some other more mass market brands.  I have read some good things about the sound quality of Innuous servers, but there are no local dealers and I am hesitant to purchase anything that I cannot demo with my existing equipment in my own listening room.

As to DACs/processors/combo units, I would automatically be disposed to the Ayre QX-5 Twenty given my experience with the company (excellent response to customer inquiries, great upgrade policy, outstandingly neutral sounding products).  Local dealers also carry the Lumin X1 (which would require trading in or selling my Lumin U1 mini, which is fine), the MSB Discrete (and its more costly brethren), Berkeley Audio Designs, T+A, Aurender, Auralic.  An out-of-town dealer with whom I’ve dealt carries some of these same brands plus Naim, dcs, Linn, and others.

As to budget, let’s say that depends to some extent on the performance the product.  For the purposes of discussion let’s say up to $5k for a music server and up to $10k for the DAC.  A bit of stretch is possible and the combined total would work for a combo product, but past experience suggests different firms have strengths in different areas.

I am particularly interested in thoughts about whether a music server or new DAC would provide more improvement.  I've read the past comments of the bits are bits naysayers and can confirm that just switching from USB to Ethernet connectivity made a big improvement.  So bits transmitted with power and circuit noise are inferior to bits transmitted with less of both!

Your feedback is sincerely appreciated.      


sameyers1
Totally agree with @millercarbon ! Everything he said on the impact of cables in the system. I also second the Synergistic Research stuff. It works!
To those who have been kind enough to respond to my post, I want to provide an update. I have followed the suggestion of @millercarbon and contacted Synergistic Research regarding their room treatments and other products. They put me in touch with Peter Hansen of The Cable Company, one of their dealers and a former Synergistic employee. Peter asked for a list of my equipment, and I sent an excerpt from my original post along with some photos of my listening room.

We spoke by phone today and the first thing he wants me to do is to try two alternate speaker locations and to swap my right and left speakers so the side-firing woofers point to the center of the listening room rather than the sides. The alternate speaker locations were recommended to get more air around the speakers. Interestingly, he was not at all concerned about increasing the distance between the speakers beyond the typically recommended norm given the distance to my listening position. He said that the HFTs will resolve any imaging issues once I’ve optimized the speaker locations as best I can. 

I’m to call him back after several days of listening to the speakers in their new location. He will then work with me on the placement of the first set of 5 HFTs. Will post in a couple of weeks after testing the first HFTs, which can be returned in 30 days for a full refund if I’m not satisfied.

Hansen was very pleasant and helpful and given his reputation I have expectations of much improved sound as I work through the process of installing the room treatments he is recommending. He suggested adding Synergistic’s Black Box to manage the lower frequencies once I’ve installed the optimal number and type of HFTs for my room and on my speakers. 

Stay tuned if you have an interest in acoustical treatments, and thanks again for your suggestions. 



Speaking of speaker placement, as it turns out most speakers are placed too far apart. It seems that audiophiles believe that a wider soundstage will result if speakers are placed far apart. However, the best, most accurate soundstage and sound generally results when speakers are located at their optimum locations, which almost always is closer than one imagines. But by starting out with speakers far apart one can perhaps never find the ideal locations. A good starting distance is 4 feet. Then, listen carefully and move the speakers incrementally apart until the soundstage snaps into place, as it were. Obviously a lot depends on the room, room treatment and the particular radiation pattern of the given speakers. The out of phase track on TEST CD or TEST LP helps enormously with speaker location. There is only one optimum set of locations for speakers in a given room. Trying to find optimum speaker locations by ear, without a method, is like trying to solve a set of x simultaneous equations in x+n unknowns. As Bob Dylan says after every song, good luck to everyone.
@keithtexas It's the room, not the speakers.  If you saw the photos I sent to Hansen you would understand.  Goal is to pull the speakers further forward into the room and away from a wall that intrudes 30" into the room at its center.  This wall forms the enclosure for a bookcase (above) and a fireplace and space for the 58" tv below.

@geoffkait Normally I would agree with you. The ratio of distance from listening position to speakers vs. distance between the speakers is currently 1.36, within the 1.2 to 1.5 normally recommended.  And voicing the speakers with a test CD plus more importantly using my own ears is how the speakers got to where they are now.  My room is a far from an ideal listening room - in addition to the issue explained above, it is open in back to the kitchen and a breakfast nook and there are limits to where I can place speakers given that it is the family room, has the tv slightly to the left of center and is not a dedicated listening room.  If the HFTs work, it would be great.  There is a 30-day free trial, so if I am not satisfied, I can return them.