HF resistor change a revelation on 12" Tannoy HPD's

Thanks, Erik. Not sure why my link didn’t work for you, although strangely when I tried the link using Google Chrome on a different computer than the one I used to submit my previous post I had to refresh the page to get the image, after initially going to the link and getting only a small symbol with an "X" in it. That issue did not arise with Chrome on the computer I used to submit my previous post, and it did not arise with Firefox or Edge on either computer (using Windows 10).

In any event the schematic that link depicts is the same as the first of the three schematics shown at your link.

... it’s value will probably affect the absolute location of the high pass filter.

That is what I was getting at, of course, and given the interaction with the 4.7 uF cap that will occur I would expect the effect of a change between 27 and 47 ohms to most likely be considerable. Although it’s hard to be certain without having some idea of the turns ratios of the inductor/autoformer taps.

Best regards,
-- Al

Hello Eric, Al and Elizabeth (all three of you are some of my favorite people in all of Audiogon).I was actually trying to find my crossover schematic, and somehow it got lost in my computer (I'm not on the best of terms with it, as it continually makes me feel quite stupid). Anyway, the values as shown on the schematic Eric posted is similar to how mine are, though the pots are removed, autoformer taps are replaced with Alpha Core ribbon inductors, Mundorf S-I-O caps (the two 6.8uf caps in the LF circuit is a single Mundorf 22uf cap, there are 3.9mh, 2.2mh, and 3.9mh inductors, and the 50ohm resistor shown in the diagram near the autoformer is the one that was changed to 27ohm, and then back to 47ohm as discussed. The original factory crossovers are housed in a pocket on the rear of the speakers, and can be easily used by just changing a few wires on a terminal block.

Al, I thank you for your nice comments regarding my system. It's a pity we can't exchange visits, I've got to think we would both enjoy ourselves.

Regards to all,
Dan

Thanks for the nice words, Dan. I do have a couple of relatives in the Seattle area, so if and when my wife and I decide to make a cross-country trip I’ll be sure to keep you in mind.

To provide some perspective on the effects of a change between 27 ohms and 47 ohms, if in the interests of simplicity we make the very crude approximation that the low frequency rolloff of the combination of that resistor and the input capacitor of the high frequency section (which I assume is 4.7 uF) is unaffected by the circuitry that is further downstream (even though that circuitry is essentially in parallel with the resistor), we have the following:

The corner frequency of the RC combination, i.e., the frequency at which the rolloff is 3 db and the phase shift is 45 degrees, would be:

F(3db) = 1/(2piRC)

For 4.7 uF and 47 ohms F(3db) = 721 Hz

For 4.7 uF and 27 ohms F(3db) = 1255 Hz

The rest of the circuitry will have its own effects on those numbers, of course, as well as affecting the rolloff of the RC combination itself. In any event, though, that’s quite a difference!

As to why the results with the other 47 ohm resistor that was used a few years ago were so different, I can’t say of course. But I would guess that while the better quality resistor is probably helping, unrelated things that have changed during that time (perhaps even additional breakin of various components) are probably more significant contributors.

Best regards,
-- Al