AV Processor Question


I'm getting the Emotive XPR-5 power amp and I'm looking for the device connectivity.

AV Receivers all seem to come with amplification and I don't need more amplification. I certainly don't want to pay for it if I've already got it.

So I started looking at AV Processors and found they cost more than with the amplification! Presumably they're marketed more to the high end user - but what's a poor boy to do?

What's the best value here? The amp blew my budget so I'm looking for the most for the least.

Thanks - rev
revnice
I think it's a bit of both. The AVRs, especially mainstream brands like Denon and Onkyo have economy of scale on their side. Dedicated pre/pros may use better quality parts, have more features and/or configuration flexibility, but it's subject to the law of diminishing returns.
There's a big gap in price between a good $1000-2000 AVR and a $6k+ pre/pro. Marantz has a reasonably priced pre/pro, but it doesn't even have the most up to date version of Audyssey.
I would say ditch the power amp and pre, and get a multi-channel integrated tube. Best the av receivers out there and some pre/power combo's.
The AVR market is just more competitive with mainstream manufacturers having to bring new models to market every year with the latest bells and whistles. If you compare current AVR models to the same manufacturers pre-pro (providing they make one), chances are the case and chassis, decoders, HDMI protocol, room correction, etc. are all the same. The only thing that is different is that the AVR gives you up to 7 channels of amplification - for less money! Kind of makes you wonder the quality of those built in amps?

I would say though that pre-pro from the higher end companies, Cary, NAD, Anthem, etc., probably offer much better 2 channel pre-amp sections than the mainstream company's pre-pros. But this is usually not why people buy AVRs or pre-pros.

HDMI 1.4, lossless decoding, etc in an AVR vs. a pre-pro is exactly the same. The same version of Audyssey in an AVR is exactly the same as what you get in a pre-pro. Therefore with exception of the analog pre-amp sections on some high end models (and this applies only to those interested in two channel music; not movies or concerts), I would say pre-pros are not superior to an AVR.

The above is why I use an AVR with a multi channel power amp. For two channel analog, I use a 2 channel pre-amp with home theater by-pass. Best of both worlds in one system.
Internetmin
Great post dude! That answers my question perfectly.

Thanks to everyone else for your 2 cents, it's great to hear a balanced set of opinions and ideas.

Great forum!

rev
PS: Post closed as far as I'm concerned
Rev,

Have fun. Glad the community could give you some thoughts that were helpful.

Theo