Upgrading sub to get a live feel.


I currently have a set of JBL 4319 which has its history as 4310. They are studio monitors and as a result they sound like studio monitors you hear everything, but they lack the physical presence on the low end. They have wonderful mid range and voice presence. I also have a pair of SVS SB1000 to help with the low end. 

I want to eventually upgrade to JBL 4367 with upgraded pair of subs, for this reason, but in the mean time would a sub upgrade be considered before the speakers. 


thewatcher101
Will be trying, 

As to the  Mirus DAC, after trying a few DAC, it is an exhausting process and not fun to try a bunch of them, at lease not for me. The MIRUS was the most uncolored and accurate DAC, but watch out for USB source, as USB has inherent audio issues. I used iso regen and their LPS, and it solved the usb problem. 

I also have a demo tomorrow with the JBL 4367. 


@thewatcher101 —

Please let us know what you think of the JBL 4367’s once you’ve auditioned them. I’d certainly be very interested to learn of your impressions.. 
I have a dual purpose main system using different amplification for pure audio vs. video, and use a pair of Hsu  VTF-15H MK2 powered subs for video only.

I have run the subs with the audio front end on occasion and they are very good indeed, not just for bass reinforcement with video. Note that they were installed using proper analytic instrumentation for location, configuration and tuning and not everyone has that available - if you just stick them wherever they fit in your room, YMMV.
wspohn:
"I have run the subs with the audio front end on occasion and they are very good indeed, not just for bass reinforcement with video. Note that they were installed using proper analytic instrumentation for location, configuration and tuning and not everyone has that available - if you just stick them wherever they fit in your room, YMMV."

Hello wspohn,

    Just to clarify for thread readers and prevent them from being discouraged or misled about incorporating one or two subs in their systems, I thought it was important to let them know the following about your post:

    While you're absolutely correct in stating that you can't expect to just stick one or two subs in your room wherever they fit in the room and expect to obtain good bass response, it's absolutely not true that they need to be installed using proper analytic instrumentation for location, configuration and tuning and not everyone has that available.
    Everybody has what's required, two ears and what's in between, and knowledge of the 'crawl method of sub positioning' to incorporate one or two subs in their system. Thread readers can refer to my previous posts on this thread or google "the crawl method of sub positioning" to learn more on the specifics of using this method.
    Your use of the abbreviation YMMV can also be misleading since their mileage will not vary. The science of Acoustics has established how the longer bass soundwaves behave in any room and this knowledge is baked into the concept and effectiveness of the 'crawl method'.
  The single most significant rationale for utilizing the 'crawl method', as an alternative to the more expensive and complicated method using analytic instrumentation, is precisely because your mileage will not vary and it can be relied upon to be just as effective in any room or system.
  I'm not claiming any of the above possibly misleading or discouraging language in your post was your intent, I just wanted to make sure a few points were clearly understood by thread readers and potential sub users.


Tim  
 

Right. As an example of just how well this DBA approach works, when my four were first installed all I did was plop them down facing the walls each one a little different distance from the corners. Instantly and without any adjustment the bass was deeper, smoother, faster and more articulate and dimensional in terms of imaging than anything I ever heard before. They have since then been tweaked down in level both dB and crossover frequency, and phase, all of it done by ear because even though I have a dB meter handy its the ears that rule.

Especially with bass. A lot of the problems people have getting this concept seem to have their roots in some really fundamental misunderstandings about how human beings hear and perceive different frequencies. We simply do not register timing with bass, for example, anywhere near the way we do higher midrange and treble frequencies.

In terms of level, meters and EQ fail to account for the way we hear bass volume. Look up Fletcher Munson curves. These graphs are not flat because unlike meters human beings do not respond to bass equally. The way we hear bass varies by volume. A lot. Look at the curves!

So as cool as it sounds and as much street cred as it might seem to get using EQ or meters or whatever other analytical doo dads one might buy, the truth is these things are more often than not used by people who don’t understand everything that is going on nearly as well as they think they do.

Go and listen. You will see.