nonoise
Just because it can misread doesn't mean it will misread. There's so much built into it that compensates for errors as well as the fact that most are very well made, that it all comes down to trying to prove a negative.Actually, no, errors on CD are well established and widely researched. See IASA website. Also, research by Trock (which I think you can get from IASA) and others. There's no need to reinvent the wheel here, or to pretend that prior research doesn't exist.
Anyone can pipe up and ask how sure you are that it's not misreading the data? That's just trolling for trolling's sake.