In the autumn of 1884, Károly Zipernowsky, Ottó Bláthy and Miksa Déri (ZBD), three engineers associated with the Ganz factory, determined that open-core devices were impractical, as they were incapable of reliably regulating voltage.[10] In their joint 1885 patent applications for novel transformers (later called ZBD transformers), they described two designs with closed magnetic circuits where copper windings were either wound around a ring core of iron wires or else surrounded by a core of iron wires.
Then there's the utterly unique thing about iron.
iron is the destination gateway for black holes. No matter which direction they come from (there are two directions in activity to get to a black hole)
They either move up to being iron and then black hole, or they move down to iron, and then a black hole. (just one way of phrasing it)
That hysteresis and the permeability, the unique parts of it re the table of elements.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permeability_(electromagnetism)#Values_for_some_common_materials
Is there something beyond the normal considerations that we are simply not 'getting'? Something about... hysteresis, permeability and time-space?
Something seems to be saying that if you want to understand black holes, you have to properly and fully understand iron, and to fully understand iron, that you must consider all of what a black hole really is.
Now..isn't that ...just..interesting.