Bricasti M3

No experience with the M3 but I have an M1 and can state that Bricasti is a great company to deal with. They resolved an issue with my M1 incredibly fast and fwiw the M1 is a great DAC. 

@musicman159 You wrote:  "more transparent and detailed than the M1SE without being musical"  

Is there a typo there??

Sorry, yes. I meant without loosing musicality.
Thanks for pointing that to me. BIG MISTAKE on my part.

Also, yesterday I tried the headphones output with a HiFiMan HE1000se and Final D8000 headphones. Both are planar magnetic and not easy to drive. The M3h drove them with ease and sound fantastic. I have a Chord Hugo TT2 as a loan which is a great DAC and headphones amp in the price range of the M3. Both sound fantastic out of the same headphones but I am personally inclining to the M3h sound plus the Chord TT2 does not have the ability to connect directly to the network.

Here is my previous post corrected. I tried to edit it but the system not allow edits after 30 minutes so I delete it to correct it and re-post it.

I own a Bricasti M21, pair of M28s and in another system a M1SE.
I got the M3h (headphones amp option). I can say that the M3 DAC sounds similar to the M21 which is more transparent and detailed than the M1SE without loosing any musicallity.
The M1 is a dual mono DAC in the analog section. That is why it has 3 individual power supplies (one for the digital section and one for each analog channel). The M3 is a smaller box and has just 2 power supplies (one for digital and one for both analog channels).
The rest of the implementation including the network card is the same as found in other Bricasti DACs.