Thiel Owners


Guys-

I just scored a sweet pair of CS 2.4SE loudspeakers. Anyone else currently or previously owned this model?
Owners of the CS 2.4 or CS 2.7 are free to chime in as well. Thiel are excellent w/ both tubed or solid-state gear!

Keep me posted & Happy Listening!
128x128jafant
This is a little late regarding the preamp discussion a few days ago, but I just wanted to chime in:  I'm very happy with no preamp whatsoever. I run a Berkeley Alpha DAC directly into the amplifier, which goes directly to my 3.7s. Sounds fabulous! I wonder why more people who have this capability don't seem to do this.
I did that for years running my PS Audio DSD DAC directly into the amp.then got the BHK preamp. do not ask me why,  but it improved things greatly.   Paul McGowan's philosophy  is that there is no preamp like no preamp,   unless you have a really great one.
Kenazfilan - the Bose 901 was a huge marketplace success at the time we were developing our initial ideas and prototypes. Audiophiles and specialty stores nearly universally rejected them as gimmicks, but there were some valid ideas in there. The crossoverless multiple driver does preserve phase relationships, which are only partially obscured by the small differences in distance to the reflecting walls. The short distance between the speaker and wall minimizes the distance difference between the reflected wavefront and front-firing direct radiator. The equalizer does not introduce phase shift and the sealed bass rolls off at 12dB / octave, which is quite benign. I concur with your speculation that the design might sound like hash with higher order crossovers introducing baked in phase shifts. 
I would love to see impulse response and other "normal" tests on the 901.It might fare fairly well at low levels in a highly damped room. But, those CTS drivers were driven far beyond their linear excursion and the dust-cap "tweeter" was very ragged, and the room perimeter drive is inherently problematic and so forth and so on. I am amazed at their success. Bose spent more on advertising than on product. And it worked for them.

 The 901 was, I believe, the only speaker that Jim dissected to see how other designs coped with the intrinsic constraints and trade-offs of the art. It definitely served as encouragement that we could do better.
tomthiel

Might you be able to provide any history of the cs .5.   This speaker, which I like to think of as the baby Thiel was my entry into the world of Thiel.   I had a pair in my main rig from 1996 to 2011 before graduating to a pair of 2.4s.   My cs .5s are now in bubble wrap in my crawl space, to be turned over to my son when he is ready for them.