YG Acoustics vs. Avantgarde Duo series comparison?

This is a funny comparison, actually maybe the most funny I have read.

What I meant to say that both speakers are so so different sounding that you cannot compare them.
There arent enough words for me to express how much I believe that YG is better than the Avantguarde.

This a great question. I'd also like to know they compare. What are their differences in how they reproduce sound?

I have had budget horns for more than twenty years (Klipsch Forte') which I enjoy and I have speakers with dynamic drivers I really enjoy also.

Mike, since you seemed to have spent time with both speakers that the OP asked about, would you mind comparing how they present music?

Thank you for your time.

Cheers,

Scott

What I meant to say that both speakers are so so different sounding that you cannot compare them.
There arent enough words for me to express how much I believe that YG is better than the Avantguarde.

Call me crazy, Argyro, but it sounds like you just compared them, and expressed a preference for one over the other. :)

John

I have heard YG Acoustics in two several occasions and for quite a bit. The big Anat and their middle in line speaker.

I have heard Avantgardes many times, almost all their models, in domestic environments - in shows etc.

The YG is much more accurate, much more revealing and a better speaker overall by a very WIDE margin IMHO.

Actually I consider Avantgardes, bad designs. By bad I mean, audible frequency ranges, coloured sound (different from what is written in the source material), and annoying.

If "High End" or "High Fidelity" if you like is about accurately reproducing the recorded material, cause this is what its all about, then the Avantgarde doesnt stand a chance next to the YG.

If someone wants to "prefer" the Avantgarde its his personal opinion, but "preferences" have nothing to do with high fidelity.

IHMO,

Mike