With the stat speaker, impedances can be as high as 30-100 ohms in the upper/lower bass, and 1 ohm or less in HF. This is more than the 10:1 ratio you cite, but still nowhere near as much as the inverse RIAA curve. Still, according to your theory, the stat speaker should sound like a less drastic inverted RIAA curve, which I didn't find in the listening. Also, all dynamic speakers have marked variations in their impedances, and your theory would predict that a SS amp would produce markedly different sound from different speakers in relation to each speaker's impedance curve.
@viber6 this isn't correct. (BTW what I'm talking about here isn't theory, its more like audio history. The Power Paradigm is what was around before MacIntosh and ElectroVoice developed the Voltage rules in the late 1950s.) With most dynamic speakers (there are exceptions in high end audio) the speaker is meant to be 'voltage driven' so variable power output is what you're looking for in the amplifier in order to get flat frequency response. The idea is plug and play, no need to adjust any midrange or treble controls (like you see on older speakers, stuff from the 50s and 60s). Of course like anything else, this approach solves one problem while introducing others.
The brightness of an unequalized RIAA curve would **not** have been compensated by the way the ESL and solid state amps work together. I think you will find though that the 10:1 ratio I described is generally pretty close- that describes Quads, Martin Logans, Accoustats and Sound Labs which are the ESLs with which I have the most experience. If you can find one that is outside of that (for example: 100:1) I'd be very interested in knowing about it!