Opinions Golden Sounds DH Cones, I just bought some,they came in today
I use 3 pucks under my preamp as well. The pucks I'm using are good for 20 pounds each. See link below. My guess is the preamp weighs around 35 lbs. FWIW, they do say to have the logo pointing toward the front (in other words, toward you). Not sure if it makes a difference or not, but that is how I've always positioned them. http://www.isoacoustics.com/iso-puck/ |
I put brass footers in place of Isoacoustic pucks and everything became transparent and refined. The DH Cones stayed under CD player. The blurred effect was gone with pucks gone everything had body again and the slow veiled sound was gone. I called Glen Carol Audio to check on some other footers and asked him if he carried the isoacoustics pucks and he said he tried them out and said he heard the same thing I did under components. He did mentioned if a system was bright the pucks may work. For my system they just didn't work and will be shipping them back tomorrow due to 30 day return policy. The DH cones are keepers and I found a set of used supers online and went ahead and bought them. I did put some DIY springs under a platform and like what they did I may order some from Geoff after I play with them for a few days. |
Yea, I was bummed they didn't work too. All the great reviews I was sure they were going to work. Maybe the minis aren't the way to go but my Preamp only weighs 15 pounds. I did pull some monitors out of the closet before I boxed them up and they did make a difference vs blue tak. I did put them under CD player and got same results. For some reason my gear likes hard footers. Brass, Nordost quasars, aluminum. One of the strangest things was when I put audioquest sorbathane under CD player highs became overly bright you would think it would be dull. So I guess every system and component acts different depending what goes under it. |
