To Fuse or Not to Fuse... That is the question!


Ok.. I think I understand that no fuse is better than a cheap fuse. And a good fuse is better than a cheap fuse. But is no fuse better than the best fuse?

One person on Audiogon said that he achieved better sound by using a Blue fuse over no fuse. I guess my question is... Do these new, high dollar fuses just allow the current to flow better with solid protection or do they actually due to quantum physics or something, actually improve upon the signal by eliminating errant bad electrons and thereby actually improving the music over no fuse at all?

I gots to know!


captaindidactic
Wiki - The fuse element is made of zinc, copper, silver, aluminum, or alloys to provide stable and predictable characteristics. The fuse ideally would carry its rated current indefinitely, and melt quickly on a small excess.


and thus (or restated) it's end result of very high levels of non linearity, and production of odd ordered harmonics as a reflection, or final effect of it's behavior when dealing with dynamic current draw.

The cheapest way to a more linear draw is to go with a 'long lag' fuse in place of a short lag or fast blow fuse. 

But such a substitution of a fuse type is not really all that 'legal' as rated fuses in gear also includes the lag aspects as part of their specification and use in that particular piece of gear. It is integral to the legal status of the electrical approval of the given device.

The question in audiophile fuses, is if the given audiophile fuse meets the spec required for that given piece of gear it is placed in.
The more I read about fuses and the distortion and noise they bring the happier I am I don’t use them any more. I thank my lucky stars ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ Color me a happy camper. 🤗
Post removed 
Imax cinema of focused sound
¿Que?

Zippy top over a swirly bucket of midrange mush?