geoffkait,
I think you may want to focus on d orbital splitting.
I think you may want to focus on d orbital splitting.
What is wrong with audiophiles?
"Which means..theory. Electrons are a theory. As in: ’we don’t know’."Extrapolated from Wikipedia Subatomic particle article. (It rhymes, geoffkait, it rhymes.) For whatever it is worth on a laymen audio website, a little lower on that Wikipedia page theory gets slightly more developed... "All of these have now been discovered by experiments..." |
Eureka! Depressed from scanning (no one could stand to actually read it) the stinking pile of putrid pedantry posted by the usual suspects above I decided to try the How Science Got Sound Wrong thread https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/how-science-got-sound-wrong Me being nothing like the empty vessels who justify their sorry existence by spending all their free time ruining perfectly good threads I first went and read the linked article. https://www.fairobserver.com/more/science/neil-young-vinyl-lp-records-digital-audio-science-news-wil... It starts out pretty good and then a few paragraphs down comes this: The anti-Neil Young comments don’t sound as much like music appreciation. Rather, they have the snide sound of an annoying know-it-all engineer. "The snide sound of an annoying know-it-all engineer." Wow. I mean, wow! I always say DYODD but in this case that would mean scrolling up and reading some of the preceding comments, but that could drop your IQ 15 points in 5 minutes and maybe even turn you off Audiogon for life. So maybe this one time just take my word for it when I say it is the snide sound of annoying know-it-all engineers. (In the "legend in his own mind" sense, I mean.) What is wrong with audiophiles? There you go. We now return you to our regularly scheduled puerile pontificating. |