How Science Got Sound Wrong


I don't believe I've posted this before or if it has been posted before but I found it quite interesting despite its technical aspect. I didn't post this for a digital vs analog discussion. We've beat that horse to death several times. I play 90% vinyl. But I still can enjoy my CD's.  

https://www.fairobserver.com/more/science/neil-young-vinyl-lp-records-digital-audio-science-news-wil...
128x128artemus_5
It's a full time job keeping up with the misinformation being spread :-)
Post removed 

atdavid
"
It's a full time job keeping up with the misinformation being spread "

With more than 375 posts in less than 30 days of membership hear you are doing an excellent job of contributing to the misinformation even if you are correct about 15% of the time.
Thank you for further contributing to the spreading of misinformation clearthink. When You can prove anything that I have said is wrong, instead of just throwing ad-hominems, maybe I will take your posts seriously. Until then, you are just bloviating in the wind.

It’s really weird why so many people fight so hard to discredit someone, and spend so little time discrediting what they say. Is that because you can’t?  I really must think that is it.


clearthink971 posts11-18-2019 1:46pm
atdavid
"It’s a full time job keeping up with the misinformation being spread "

With more than 375 posts in less than 30 days of membership hear you are doing an excellent job of contributing to the misinformation even if you are correct about 15% of the time.