Doug Schroeder Method, Double ic

spenav, a very nice description of the benefits of Schroeder Method in your system; kudos! It is also of benefit to the community as you shared about use with a class D amp, even a modified one. It is also good to demonstrate that it influences XLR as well as RCA. The system I currently am running has two sets as well, one RCA and  the other XLR. 

Your description is accurate to what I have experienced with use; not a radical remake/skewing of he sonic attributes as if swapping out cables for another brand, but superior in the attributes already enjoyed through  increase or a deepening of them. The intensity of the change is that of a component, but without potential to skew the sound away from what is desired. I suggest that you consider also the information retrieval and dynamics. You should have superior definition and better macrodynamics, as well. 

Now, if a different brand of ICs were used in Schroeder Method, then as expected the entire presentation would change in ways that may be more or less enjoyable in terms of clarity, distribution of intensity along the frequency spectrum (i.e. more bass and less treble presence, or vice versa), etc. 

Going with the affordable Mogami cables that is a sensible, efficacious change to a system. It also confirms my conclusion that Schroeder Method is efficacious with all ICs, regardless of cost. That does not mean I think that an inexpensive IC in Schroeder Method will typically outperform a higher end double IC, but it supports the fact that audiophiles along the cost/performance spectrum can benefit.
 

Hi Doug

I forgot to thank you for your philanthropy as most likely you are not profiting from your advice and findings to our community.  Some people have made a fortune for far less contribution.
I have always used the Mogami ICs with great results and am happy with them and doubly now in their SM form. you are correct as it relates to the information retrieval and dynamics, they have improved also and I expect things to get even better once the cables settle after a couple of hundreds hours. I just wanted to give a quick first impression because the changes were impressive for such minimal configuration differences. Thanks again.

spenav, you are welcome.

When I revealed Schroeder Method more than a year ago I did not realize the business potential. I did not have perspective in business, nor confidence to seek a patent. Someone who did partnered with me, and now there is a patent application. 

My total profit so far from Schroeder Method are two pair of prototype double cables and some Y cables on loan from a cable manufacturer. I spent more on multiple sets of hard splitters and Y-cables for comparison than the cables are worth. What's nice is that even if this pays off for me, the guy with a tight budget can still do a homemade Schroeder Method set of interconnects. It really can be a win/win for everyone.  :) 

I concur with you whole heartedly that some people have made good money for far less a contribution. I can feel comfortable about Schroeder Method that it's not a rip-off scheme. It's a legit method with obvious results. 

(Mr.) Doug Schroeder,

Thank you.

grannyring,

I use my SM ICs on The Truth no gain preamp with great results. My customers use SM ICs on SET amps with great results. No issues at all with SM ICs based on my experiences with customers on all manner of gear.

I finally understand what a DSM (Duelund Schroder Method) interconnect is and what it does. Especially from the preamp (The Truth) to the amp (Any Clayton Audio amp).

My question is will it also work from a turntable with female RCA’s out to a phono preamp in? In my setup the phono interconnects HAVE to be shielded. But hey, but I can live with that.

(GRG) - grannyring (gear)...Thank you, Thank you, Thank you.

And to think about 10 or so years ago I thought HT (Home Theater) was the tops in audio gear? Go figure...

Also, does the SM work with speaker wire also? As I use ’single’ Duelund 12GA wire.