How Science Got Sound Wrong


I don't believe I've posted this before or if it has been posted before but I found it quite interesting despite its technical aspect. I didn't post this for a digital vs analog discussion. We've beat that horse to death several times. I play 90% vinyl. But I still can enjoy my CD's.  

https://www.fairobserver.com/more/science/neil-young-vinyl-lp-records-digital-audio-science-news-wil...
128x128artemus_5
" For a drive-by shooting, his aim was incredibly accurate. "
  Well it is a big slow moving target to hit so there is that to consider too.
OK, want to hear a joke? What do you get when you cross a mentally slow learner with a community that abandons him and treats him like trash? You get what you deserve! An angry pseudo-skeptic. 😡

GK,
It is nice to see you finally admit you are an angry pseudo-skeptic.
Did you think of that all by yourself? Maybe you should consider getting someone to write your jokes for you as yours are not too good. Comedy is subjective. Maybe you should get someone to debate for you, too, now that I think about it. See, that’s funny! 😛
True, but it is always "spinning" so that does increase the level of difficulty.

mahlman126 posts11-26-2019 1:25p
  Well it is a big slow moving target to hit so there is that to consider too.