Has to be said
"Well, how does one bring it into tune??" you tune it "everything affects everything else" mg you guys should try doing stuff once in a while :) For those who have already converted to Low Mass Tunable systems, you’re so far ahead of the curve it does make these threads a little odd if not hilarious. http://www.michaelgreenaudio.net/ |
berner99, There are any number of things that very large numbers of people believe in that simply are not true. I would be here probably all night making up a list of them, and we are not talking 1 or 2 people, we are talking millions (or more). You have to admit there is a big difference from "heard a difference" and "thought I heard a difference", with the latter being the case 99% of the time on these forums. Anyone who thinks they are immune to bias w.r.t what they are hearing is fooling only themselves. Our memory for subtle audio differences is exceptionally poor. Mood alone, changes in sitting position, etc. will have bigger impacts than many things discussed. Humidity will have a bigger effect. This bias is why anyone who researches audible effects uses at a minimum blind testing and preferably double blind testing. Even ad-hoc blind tests can show a perceived difference really was not there. Quoting Max Planck w.r.t. what is discussed here is akin to giving validity to those who promote the earth being flat. A scientist will listen to anecdotal evidence to provide inspiration, but, and a big but, they don't accept it as factual until tested, as above, with proper tests. Then they will try to isolate causes and effects. You will note the loudest proponents of "questionable" sonic methods are the ones most against any formal testing. Why is that? What are they afraid of (other than being wrong)? berner9922 posts12-09-2019 2:59pmA large number of posts on many threads boil down to: |
Clearthink, Once again, I will remind you that this is a libellous statement. Think what you want, but when you libel someone online, you can be legally responsible. You seem to like to make these claims. One day it will catch up to you. Keep in mind if sued, you would need to prove I used Wikipedia. Your personal attacks with 0, and I do mean 0 content related to my posts are of no value. clearthink993 posts12-09-2019 4:03pm |
Humidity will have a bigger effect. This bias is why anyone who researches audible
yes and airdensity/press ie altitude. maybe ill market mounitn speakers that can acoustic impedance couple the thin air better.... ps we ran all jan/mil acoustic at Std temp/press 1000mb@72deg 30% non turblent laminar from above . |
