Considering an upgrade
@sonicjoy, the links don’t work because the second occurrence of "http" in each link (or "https" in some cases, in that position) is not followed by a colon. Also, the first occurrence of "http://" in each link should not be there, although it is not present in the actual URL underlying the visible link, which is what is used by the web browser program. That first "http://" appears in the visible link because the "insert URL" button above the response box inserts it by default (as you can see when that button is clicked), but although it is not the reason your links don’t work it would be best to delete it before pasting the URL into that box. And in fact with modern browser programs it isn’t necessary to even use that box, unless you want to highlight some text in your post and make it clickable, like this. Otherwise, just paste the URL directly into the post. Regards, -- Al |
The advantage of your PC is the Roon core. I'm not sure why you would want to replace the PC also, since you are already using Roon. I can understand asking about what might be an upgrade over the BDP-2 and/or Yggdrasil gen2. The biggest change would come from changing your DAC. The Yggdrasil has a fairly distinctive sound in my opinion, and there are lots of other DAC options out there that might sound better to your ears. On the other hand if you auditioned a bunch of DACs before deciding upon the Yggdrasil, maybe you should just stick with it since you said you're happy with what you've got. There are Roon Ready network streaming DACs, which would replace both the BDP-2 and Yggdrasil. My personal recommendation in that case would be to look at Lumin, for the hardware and firmware quality. Since you're already using Roon, the software ecosystem of any network streaming DAC would not be a primary concern. Regarding your question about upgrading from a BDP-2 to a BDP-3, the majority of differences are around the feature set and software capabilities. |
Thanks for all the comments. The only reason I was considering replacing the PC as the Roon core was to find something that could work in my stereo rack and eliminate the Ethernet cabling. The current PC is not silent so it's located in another room. I think I'd probably only consider replacing it if I could combine with a streamer. So the W4S or Innuos devices are definitely options too consider. My Yggy DAC is now my oldest component. I had a W4S Dac-2 prior to this and was never happy with the sound. I ordered the Yggy based on the positive reviews and liked the way it sounded so kept it after the trial period. So I haven't actually auditioned anything else in my current system. I went many years without making significant changes to my system. It's only been the past couple years that I've been working to upgrade my system to get the level of sound quality that I can be happy with for a while. I'm not sure that I want to upgrade the digital front end, but since these are now my oldest components, I thought I'd at least explore the options. This is also driven somewhat by my acquisition of new speakers which are much more revealing. |
@jaytor regarding a silent PC you could pick up something fanless like an Intel NUC for relatively low cost, and migrate your Roon Core onto that device. If you really like the Roon software. I'd recommend checking out the user interface that you'd end up using with any other music management devices, if you're willing to replace the Roon Core. Besides the W4S and Innuos there is Aurender and Lumin (requires an external NAS). But going with separates for the DAC and network streamer will open more options for a change (improvement) in your sound quality. Auditioning different DACs is what I'd recommend. |
