Cartridge loading


Presently I am using a ZU/Denon DL103 mc cartridge with ZU Audio's highest tolerances.  I had this cartridge mounted on my VPI Prime and after going through all the various loading combinations, I settled on 200 ohms.  I was always satisfied with my choice of setting.  I no longer have the Prime and now use the Technics SL1200G turntable.  After having the same cartridge mounted and aligned by the dealer, I inserted it into my system and enjoyed the sound immensely, never touching the 200 ohm setting.

Yesterday I was listening to vinyl most of the day and for some reason I found the sound to be better than ever, mostly in the treble area.  The highs had shimmer when needed and I had played the same records many times before on the Prime and they never sounded as good as they did yesterday.  Just for the heck of it, I checked the cartridge loading and found it was now set at 1000 ohms.  As I said, when I put the Technics into the system, I never bothered changing the loading which was at 200 ohms as it was the same cartridge, just a different turntable.

I believe I know what happened, when I last used the tone controls on my McIntosh preamp, (you have to shuffle through a menu) I must have inadvertently put the cartridge loading at 1000 ohms.  It truly sounds fantastic, better than I ever thought possible.  The Bass is still very deep and taut, midrange is the same but the treble, oh my, so much better.  Now the million dollar question is why should it now sound better at 1000 ohms, when it sounded great before at 200 ohms?  Can the tonearm on the Technics have an effect on cartridge loading?  I always thought it was all dependent on the preamp, amp and speakers.  What am I missing here?  I am very curious to know.  The specs for my cartridge say greater than 50 ohms for loading.

Thanks
128x128stereo5
Dear @lewm  and friends : This was the main subject in the first intactaudio post:


"" article in IAR #5 by Peter Moncrief titled "Audio Fallacies Exposed Low Impedance Loads for MC Cartridges" about loading and he proposes that loading down a cartridge helps it keep better contact with the grove. ""

Years ago too Palmer posted in Agon as an answer to atmasphere:

"""   not on tracking which is demonstrably false based on IM tests on tracking performance that I have incidentally performed as a function of load. """

@atmasphere  thank's for your comments and I and maybe some one else would like to know which is that "  in my sample set ".

R.


Dear @lewm  :  """  I would posit that subjective testing based only on listening is fraught with error, not the least of which is error due to listener bias..""""

do you already made the tests I did it? no? then just do it and you will know that that " listener bias " just does not exist because what you are looking for is if you can detect " anomalies " ( other than little changes due to differences on SPLs due to the load resistor. ) in the specific HF range.


Those kind of listening tests is a good approach to confirm that at least by our ears/brain there is no limit trace problem with the cartridge tracking abilities.

Taske your time and try it or not, is up to you.

R.

@noromance 
great explanation of cartridge loading BTW - I wish someone explained that to me many moons ago - before I read around and figured it out
Can I just ask if others have found that say 100ohms on one cartridge for a phono stage is altogether different on another phono stage?
Started out interesting...got a little personal...then brain damage set in. I think I’ll load the cartridge where it sounds the best to me, take a Tylenol and let y’all hash it out. Cheers!  
btw thanks @atmasphere for your normal well thought-out and non-combative posts