2. analog
  3. 133916-3933

Thumbs up for ultrasonic record cleaning

My Cleaner Vinyl ultrasonic record cleaner arrived today and it’s impressive.

Everything I’d read indicated that ultrasonic was the way to go, and now I count myself among the believers. Everything is better - records are quieter, less ticks and pops, more detail etc.

All my records had been previously cleaned with a vacuum record cleaner and were well cared for. Nonetheless, the difference is obvious and overwhelmingly positive.

Phil
phil0618
jtimothya
612 posts
 
80kHz is much quieter than 40kHz.  A combination of both frequencies gives the best results.  40kHz means larger vacuum bubbles with greater implosive force,.  80kHz yields less force but more, smaller bubbles.
@j_damon - 40 degrees C is too hot. 
j_damon
388 posts
 
@ktimothyaI
I have been seeing 45C used in this thread, now you tell me 40C is too hot, I don’t understand 
j_damon
388 posts
 
Yes my tank is 40khz, I’m thinking of building an enclosure of panel insulation to mute the noise, it is kind of annoying 
j_damon
388 posts
 
@slaw 
mine is admittedly an inexpensive Chinese tank, when I was looking to buy noise was unfortunately not a detail I considered
Ag insider logo xs@2x
cleeds
6,014 posts
 
j_damon
... I’m thinking of building an enclosure of panel insulation to mute the noise, it is kind of annoying
Yup, US cleaners do make an annoying racket. Klaudio sold a dampening cabinet for its cleaner. Very effective!
More to discover