Esoteric DV-50: Any cdp's Significantly better?


Is there are anyone out there who has compared the Esoteric DV-50 to a number of dedicated red book only players (or other universal's) and found one that is SIGNIFICANTLY better?

I stress significantly because in my humble opinion the redbook playback (if comparison unit is just a cd cd player only )must be significantly better to justify losing DVD-A, SACD and DVD-Video capability.

I keep hearing there are better one box solutions and being a die hard 2 channel fan I would sell my DV-50 if I found a player in the same price range that sounds significantly better. But every time I do an AB comparision to other well respected units the DV-50 has slayed each and every one.

So far, it has eaten the lunch of the Classe CDP-10, Ayre CX-7, Linn Ikemi, Cairn Fog Vers. 2, Cary 306/300, Arcam DV 27A and CD 33T, Myryad CD 600, etc. It even betters a Sony SCD 777ES/MF Tri-Vista 21 transport/dac combo that I previously owned. I'm only comparing the DV-50 to single box cd or universal players, but I just wanted to mention the Sony/MF combo. I'm sure there are some dac/transport combo's that will handily beat the DV 50.

Some may say that the DV 50 should beat all the above because the of price point ($5,500 vs. average price of $3,000 for the above players). But I disagree since conventional wisdom says that stand alone players (especially with the pedigree of those mentioned above) should produce better redbook than a universal player trying to be a jack of all trades. Only the DV 27A does video plus audio. By the way, I was very impressed with the 27A as just a cd player. Of all the above I would say the Ayre was the best.

Next on my list is the Electrocompaniet EMC 1UP and the Resolution Audio Opus 21. However, I must tell you I am really impressed with the DV 50 and all the great reviews are absolutely true. I've noticed that many people who are using it or comparing to other players are using the RCA analog outs instead of the balanced outs. There is a significant improvement in sound if you use the balanced outs and I'm only interested in hearing comments from people who have compared it against other players using the balanced outs on the DV-50.

My system components are as follows:

B&W N803's speakers & HTM-1 center
Cary Cinema 5 (5 x 200) amp
Anthem D1 Statement pre/pro
Esoteric DV 50
Acoustic Zen Satori Shotgun speaker wire
Nirvana SX balanced interconnects from DV-50 to Anthem
Acoustic Zen Matrix reference II interconnects from D1 to Cary
No after market power cords or isolation equipment

My system sounds great! Those who comment please make sure to specify what specific improvements you heard over the DV 50 and what cdp were you comparing it against.

AVGURU
avguru
Alex have you read Eric post it is the APL that is
more fatiguing,He is the one who dont own any of
the player in the Shootout.
In my system the SonyModwright 9000ES is very accurate
and musical,the bass is very natural,no overhang,
Its not flabby,with the Virtual Dynamic Nite pc,
the bass became more musical accompanied
with total harmony,it also produces the full rich
sounding sound,I believe the SonyModwright
9000ES is for mature listener,the treble is just
about right, no hyperextension,no brightness at all,
To me musicality is the most important character
of a system,Accuracy is very hard to tell, because
during the recording we are not present,
Musicality is the one that involve the listener,
playing cd after cd, LP after LP.
I dont trust measurement,many gear who did very well in
measurement did not sound good, I trust my ears.
Alex the comment of Eric and Avguru are extremely
accurate on the two Shootout.
Also I want to remind you the 9000ES did performed
consistently in Mark system, Steve system, and
Brian's system.And never notice any coloration.Likewise
Iam very happy to those who own the APL.Enjoy the
music not accuray.
Jayctoy, as I mentioned, I have listened to your player on three occasions and in two different systems. What I heard (and measured) was consistent as well. I also know in detail how your player is built from the AC power inlet to the analog outputs.

I am really happy for you that you like the sound of your 9000ES. You are right; the music enjoyment is what matters most.

I wish I could fly you over here with your 9000ES because this would be the only way for you to understand what I am talking about.

Till then, enjoy the music!

Regards,
Alex
Alex thank you for all your response.I
do greatly appreciate them.And regards
to you also.Bon
Attention those with MODWRIGHT SIGNATURE TRUTH products!

Regarding the 999ES specifically, is it really worth getting the full Platinum package for $1750... or will the Basic level at $1150 get you 95% of the way there??

What exactly do you gain with AC and Slipstream Bybee filters??

Just wondering if it's worth the extra dosh. Thanks in advance!
Pardales, multiple threads seem to be going along on a single thread. I think your observations about the Exemplar 2900 are apt. I too found it did most for redbook while still improving sacd. I too lost interest in discriminating against cds as they sounded so good.

But the Exemplar 3910 is a different animal. After this sucker is broken in, there is no question that sacds are superior. When a sacd is on, you hear the soundstage open and the speakers disappear. Cds are improved also, but they remain stuck between the speakers.

While I have no question that the Reimyo CDP777 cd player might make you forget about sacds, I think the Exemplar 3910 will make you want more sacds.