2. amps-preamps
  3. 156243-144981

Parasound JC-2 BP vs Mcintosh C49

Hi,  

I've been thinking about upgrading my system by purchasing a dedicated 2 channel stereo preamp.  I've been using my Marantz 8802A surround sound prepropresssor in 'Pure Direct' mode for music.   I only run a 3 channel home theater and have a Parasound A31 3 channel power amps.  I recently upgraded my front speakers to B&W 804D3.  I would say I'm using my system 90% of the time for music.

The 2 preamps I've been thinking about is Parasound JC-2 BP or the Macintosh C49.    Just curious if anyone had experience with comparing these 2 preamps?   I would like your thoughts on these 2 preamps.

Thanks very much.
128x128xcool
xcool's avatar
xcool OP
273 posts
 
Just looking for overall improvement in sound quality. Particularly better imaging, sound stage, and more (punchy) bass.

I don’t think my current setup is bringing out the full potential of my new speakers. Thanks.
jaytor's avatar
jaytor
766 posts
 
I have both the Marantz 8802 and the Parasound JC2-BP. While the 8802 is an excellent home theater processor, the Parasound provides more detail and much better imaging - deeper, broader and more 3-dimensional sound stage. The Marantz sound flat in comparison. For music, it's a worthwhile upgrade. 

I haven't heard the McIntosh.
xcool's avatar
xcool OP
273 posts
 
OK. Thanks.  Good to know about your JC-2 experience.  
gpullman
14 posts
 
need some help oh wise ones.....just bought jc2 bp [already own jc1 monos] I have a nad  m51 dac ……. when the m51 is conn. to the jc2 via xlr slight muffled sounding…...when using rca the sound improves.???
soundbysound
1 posts
 
I had a Pass pre and a Music Fidelity pre the JC2 is the best pre amp ever heard it makes my old shitty cds sound great
More to discover