@erik_squires wrote: "Maybe there’s a different way for swarm fan boys to behave more respectfully towards others and try to answer the OP’s question without asking him to triple the number of speakers in his home??"
"Swarm fan boys" are not perfect either, and neither am I. I have seen "swarm fan boys" come across as mocking other solutions, and hope I have not done that. But I didn’t see them labelling others as a "cult" or accusing them of dishonesty.
Erik: "Invariably, the swarm people attempt sideline any other solution that is not swarm."
"Invariably"? This is an exaggeration. As far as "sidelining any other solution", that’s a judgment call; could such terminology be applied to your posts advocating room treatments? In practice nobody has time to make a truly comprehensive post so we focus on a few things.
"My perception of the intent of the swarm promoters has gone from thinking they are merely happy fanboys to something entirely different as a result of enough interactions."
This is innuendo, and assumes the worst about a whole group of people based on interaction with a few. And in case you are implying that there is some sort of "promotion" effort by "swarm promoters", I have NEVER asked any of my customers to either post, or not post, anything. I seldom even thank them.
"The combination of lack of acceptance of previous knowledge and science as well as the attempt of fitting into every system..."
These are exaggerations.
"... and random people showing up trying to make up reasons why only swarm could possibly work".
I have not noticed these alleged posts by random people, can you point them out? And did they REALLY say that "only swarm could possibly work"?
"... and misquoting experts..."
That’s possible, but not necessarily evidence of nefarious intentions. Can you show me?
"I cannot imagine this type of behavior as coming from sincerity anymore."
When we assume the worst about someone else, who does that say the most about, them or us?
"Maybe there’s a way the swarm cult can stop thinking I’m a fool who would not notice?"
Name-calling, and assuming facts not in evidence.
Erik, I do not question your integrity. I think you are sincerely pissed off, and I think you are seeing what you want to see. I also think that’s a choice, but of a type we tend not to be aware of. I think you are defending something which does not need defending.
"Just spit balling."
Me too.
Duke
"Swarm fan boys" are not perfect either, and neither am I. I have seen "swarm fan boys" come across as mocking other solutions, and hope I have not done that. But I didn’t see them labelling others as a "cult" or accusing them of dishonesty.
Erik: "Invariably, the swarm people attempt sideline any other solution that is not swarm."
"Invariably"? This is an exaggeration. As far as "sidelining any other solution", that’s a judgment call; could such terminology be applied to your posts advocating room treatments? In practice nobody has time to make a truly comprehensive post so we focus on a few things.
"My perception of the intent of the swarm promoters has gone from thinking they are merely happy fanboys to something entirely different as a result of enough interactions."
This is innuendo, and assumes the worst about a whole group of people based on interaction with a few. And in case you are implying that there is some sort of "promotion" effort by "swarm promoters", I have NEVER asked any of my customers to either post, or not post, anything. I seldom even thank them.
"The combination of lack of acceptance of previous knowledge and science as well as the attempt of fitting into every system..."
These are exaggerations.
"... and random people showing up trying to make up reasons why only swarm could possibly work".
I have not noticed these alleged posts by random people, can you point them out? And did they REALLY say that "only swarm could possibly work"?
"... and misquoting experts..."
That’s possible, but not necessarily evidence of nefarious intentions. Can you show me?
"I cannot imagine this type of behavior as coming from sincerity anymore."
When we assume the worst about someone else, who does that say the most about, them or us?
"Maybe there’s a way the swarm cult can stop thinking I’m a fool who would not notice?"
Name-calling, and assuming facts not in evidence.
Erik, I do not question your integrity. I think you are sincerely pissed off, and I think you are seeing what you want to see. I also think that’s a choice, but of a type we tend not to be aware of. I think you are defending something which does not need defending.
"Just spit balling."
Me too.
Duke