djones, not thinking things through again:
Really? Why? Could it be, because you don't understand the difference between someone relating their individual personal experience and the release of a statistically valid peer reviewed article in Nature?
I see. So you're here for all the.... lack of information. You would be content to come here and read page after page of vague useless pabulum.
Well that does explain a lot. Yes it certainly does. If only there were some way to verify....
It puzzles me why anyone declares HUGE changes without taking into account human biases.
Really? Why? Could it be, because you don't understand the difference between someone relating their individual personal experience and the release of a statistically valid peer reviewed article in Nature?
Now "I think there was a slight improvement but I have no way to verify" , elicits no response from me.
I see. So you're here for all the.... lack of information. You would be content to come here and read page after page of vague useless pabulum.
Well that does explain a lot. Yes it certainly does. If only there were some way to verify....