David,
You make good points regarding the placement of the Nenuphars on the Townshend Seismic Platforms.
1. When I first placed the Nenuphars on the Platforms I noticed a distinct improvement in bass response, as well as other other SQ issues that have been well documented in this thread. The speakers were on their original spikes and rubber feet. I mention this because I too was worried about the Platform negatively impacting bass response because of the having the double surface you mentioned.
2. The strips of wood do not interfere with the port of the Nenuphar. The front 1x2 is underneath the solid portion of the speaker bottom between the spikes and the front plane of the speaker. The rear strip has less bottom surface to work with but rests underneath the maybe 3/8" between the port and the back plane of the speaker.
3. I have been careful to maintain the angle of backward slant that the original spikes and rubber feet created.
So even though I have not coupled very much of the speaker's bottom surface area to the platform, it is obviously significantly greater than the surface area touched by the spikes and rubber feet.
I have to emphasize that this way of coupling the speaker to the Platform created an immediate change in sound--not subtle as they say. I thought the change improved virtually all aspects of the speakers performance, including bass. It would be great for some Nenuphar/Townshend Platform owner to corroborate this: obviously a change in sound this strong could be interpreted negatively by other people.
My friend who passed this info on from Max does not have Nenuphars, so didn't have to deal with the port issue. He had a special bottom plate built for his Spatial Audio Lumina's by Clayton Shaw, the designer, who was also impressed by the benefits.
You make good points regarding the placement of the Nenuphars on the Townshend Seismic Platforms.
1. When I first placed the Nenuphars on the Platforms I noticed a distinct improvement in bass response, as well as other other SQ issues that have been well documented in this thread. The speakers were on their original spikes and rubber feet. I mention this because I too was worried about the Platform negatively impacting bass response because of the having the double surface you mentioned.
2. The strips of wood do not interfere with the port of the Nenuphar. The front 1x2 is underneath the solid portion of the speaker bottom between the spikes and the front plane of the speaker. The rear strip has less bottom surface to work with but rests underneath the maybe 3/8" between the port and the back plane of the speaker.
3. I have been careful to maintain the angle of backward slant that the original spikes and rubber feet created.
So even though I have not coupled very much of the speaker's bottom surface area to the platform, it is obviously significantly greater than the surface area touched by the spikes and rubber feet.
I have to emphasize that this way of coupling the speaker to the Platform created an immediate change in sound--not subtle as they say. I thought the change improved virtually all aspects of the speakers performance, including bass. It would be great for some Nenuphar/Townshend Platform owner to corroborate this: obviously a change in sound this strong could be interpreted negatively by other people.
My friend who passed this info on from Max does not have Nenuphars, so didn't have to deal with the port issue. He had a special bottom plate built for his Spatial Audio Lumina's by Clayton Shaw, the designer, who was also impressed by the benefits.