Vandersteens on active speakers and room correction


Fast forward to around 2:16:10 time mark.  It wouldn't be a surprise though
of what he thinks.  "Above 150Hz", he said there is nothing that can be
compared with using high quality capacitors and air coil inductors.  

Below 150Hz I think that's where active makes sense.  Maybe that's
why his high end speakers are using active subwoofer for the bass.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E69dKx8uAXY

andy2
I think IF your everyday  Listening tool is a pair of Vandy 7 speakers and amps in a great room with a preamp of your own design with a Brinkmann / Triplaner / Lyra Atlas front end, iF you could get an active digital box to sound better, I would expect Richard to be all over it. There are designers who do choose to go the active route. Certainly the Roger Modjeski designed Beveridge filter is IMO one of the best sounding.
Fundamentally, Vandersteen is an analog company, I am a black sheep with my digital front end 7 system.Funny how both my Aesthetix DAC and ARC preamps have defeats for the chip driven displays - both sound better OFF. I suspect that because the Jim White designed DAC puts all the digital stuff inside a Faradcage, the defeat effect is smaller. So it would have been the easy route to use a chip to manage cooling on the model 7 amp... a designer who lives by principles :-)
fun
good music

Actually Eric it’s amazing how reruns with the computer generate different results....

at the end of the day, no computer is going to fix a cone that is out of phase to the input signal 1/3 of the time over large % of the radiator- again it cracks me up that people obsess about distortion or hyper flat frequency response and think 33% is a good number....

the ugly elephant is pistonic eliminates trash which today counts as efficiency !!!!
Pro Tip for those running the automated tools - do a run at normal listening hours and again at 2am... compare !

its all about s to n in the room