tomshults,
"None of the posts that I saw raised the matter of Dolby cassette noise reduction and its tracking issues."
I think a few of us did, albeit by omission.
I for one never liked what Dolby B did to the sound. It was a bit like throwing a heavy shirt over your speakers.
Dolby C was definitely better, but still you could hear it messing up the timing somewhat.
No Dolby and good chrome tape (ferric was worse in every way especially dynamics and hiss) and it was like listening to a junior reel to reel deck.
Head alignment was also crucial, particularly for high frequency and separation. I used to wonder how many people might have been listening to tape with misaligned tape heads.
Life before the internet would probably seem slow, strange and frustrating to those who never experienced it. We knew of nothing else.
"None of the posts that I saw raised the matter of Dolby cassette noise reduction and its tracking issues."
I think a few of us did, albeit by omission.
I for one never liked what Dolby B did to the sound. It was a bit like throwing a heavy shirt over your speakers.
Dolby C was definitely better, but still you could hear it messing up the timing somewhat.
No Dolby and good chrome tape (ferric was worse in every way especially dynamics and hiss) and it was like listening to a junior reel to reel deck.
Head alignment was also crucial, particularly for high frequency and separation. I used to wonder how many people might have been listening to tape with misaligned tape heads.
Life before the internet would probably seem slow, strange and frustrating to those who never experienced it. We knew of nothing else.