Whoever would like to argue about his statements, could you please keep it on the same level of writing skill?almarg:
Here are some examples of how a sonic comparison between two cables can yield exactly opposite (or at least very different) results depending on the specific application:The statement is "here are some examples of how a sonic comparison between two cables CAN yield exactly opposite (or at least very different) results"...
"Can" means might, may, could. "Can" does not mean "does". Thus everything that follows is at best probability and imagination.
This is meant as an argument to refute my argument which is, in a word, "does". You simply cannot refute "does" with might. The refutation of "does" is "does not".
It is highly ironic that such illogic immediately follows a post on the 10 logical fallacies. It is fully accepted no one has bothered to watch the video- or if they have, to have not learned a single one of its lessons.
For proof I offer the preceding posts.
There ya go gluppo, and brevity is the soul of wit. Read it and weep.