Who says cables don't make a difference?


Funny, after all these years, people still say things like "you wasted all that money on cables". 
There are still those who believe cables don't make a difference.
I once did marketing for a cable line I consider to be about the best-Stealth Audio Cables. 
One CES, I walked the rooms with the designer/owner, Serguei Timachev. He carried a pair of his then new Indra interconnects. Going from room to room he asked the room runners to replace their source to preamp IC with the Indra. There was not one that was not completely flabbergasted and said that the Indras blew away what they were using. That was the skyrocketing of Indra and Stealth. The Indra became one of the best reviewed cables ever.
Serguei now makes the Sakra-an IC that blows away the Indra!
I don't understand why some still do not value cables as much as I.
mglik
And one could easily claim that most differences that audiophiles claim to hear between cables are just that, claims. Difference is people who make that claim would have more controlled experimental data on their side than you. It’s best not to insult others from a shaky position. What’s a more supportable position to assume you have infallible audio memory or to assume it is fallible?

Cue Mr. Pebbles with some pithy yet predictably inane and wrong comment.



hiendmmoe85 posts07-04-2020 1:03pmTo the original question. The people who claim a cable can make a difference are the ones that can hear the difference when a better cable is used. I’ve come to the conclusion anti cable propaganda is associated with a group of people who’s
hearing isn’t capable of hearing at a level where a good cable can make a difference.

What do people who don’t worry about cables have in common with the people of Finland?
Post removed